Earlier quoted context omitted.
The democratic solution is to get people to care about your issue. If the anti-abortionists can do it, so can privacy advocates. Also, we have no idea whether Lavabit's operator's real situation is (though I certainly fault the government for the ridiculous NSL scheme that prevents him from spilling the beans). Is he objecting to installing a PRISM-style scheme, or to legitimate wiretaps?
>>The democratic solution is to get people to care about your issue. If the anti-abortionists can do it, so can privacy advocates. Not quite the same thing. Abortion is an inherently sensitive topic that is susceptible to emotion. Saying something as simple as "they are killing helpless babies!" is enough to get a ton of people on the anti-abortion side. What's the equivalent of privacy? How do we make the 4th amendm…
"Obama is going to make it illegal to speak out against abortion" (by spying on anti-abortionists).
"Obama is going to make religion illegal" (by spying on your church e-mails).
"Obama is going to shut down the Tea Party" (by spying on their emails).
"Obama is going to criminalize anti-Obama criticism" (by spying on Facebook).
Raise money and run ads in red states associating Nancy Pelosi with the whole scheme.
These sound out there (and are), but: 1) there is a grain of truth embedded in each one; 2) they speak viscerally to things people care about; 3) they will get an emotional reaction.