Cost Analysis: Trubrain Proprietary Nootropic Blend vs. Generic Equivalent
1–10 of 14 posts
Re: Cost Analysis: Trubrain Proprietary Nootropic Blend vs. Generic Equivalent
#2That said, kudos for explicitly including labor/time costs in the calculation.
Re: Cost Analysis: Trubrain Proprietary Nootropic Blend vs. Generic Equivalent
#3This was a nice breakdown of the unit costs, but I surprised by the author's conclusion. Even with a cheap value for his time ($25/hr), he's only saving about $15 dollars a year. That said, kudos for explicitly including labor/time costs in the calculation.
Re: Cost Analysis: Trubrain Proprietary Nootropic Blend vs. Generic Equivalent
#4This was a nice breakdown of the unit costs, but I surprised by the author's conclusion. Even with a cheap value for his time ($25/hr), he's only saving about $15 dollars a year. That said, kudos for explicitly including labor/time costs in the calculation.
Re: Cost Analysis: Trubrain Proprietary Nootropic Blend vs. Generic Equivalent
#5Re: Cost Analysis: Trubrain Proprietary Nootropic Blend vs. Generic Equivalent
#6Mood elevators or stimulants, sure. Hitler was all into those. But, nootropics? I mean, I guess it depends on where you draw the line of what is considered one.
Re: Cost Analysis: Trubrain Proprietary Nootropic Blend vs. Generic Equivalent
#7It's funny to me that no one has ever claimed to have accomplished anything globally significant while using nootropics to my knowledge. Mood elevators or stimulants, sure. Hitler was all into those. But, nootropics? I mean, I guess it depends on where you draw the line of what is considered one.
Re: Cost Analysis: Trubrain Proprietary Nootropic Blend vs. Generic Equivalent
#8Even subjective observations would be interesting albeit not as persuasive.
Thanks for the cost analysis btw, very thorough job.
Re: Cost Analysis: Trubrain Proprietary Nootropic Blend vs. Generic Equivalent
#9Re: Cost Analysis: Trubrain Proprietary Nootropic Blend vs. Generic Equivalent
#10This was a nice breakdown of the unit costs, but I surprised by the author's conclusion. Even with a cheap value for his time ($25/hr), he's only saving about $15 dollars a year. That said, kudos for explicitly including labor/time costs in the calculation.
I think you should also consider the risk of getting bored when you do everything yourself. If the stuff really helps, you might not want to risk stopping because it's too much work.