Live data from Hacker News

Announcing TypeScript 0.9.1

blogs.msdn.com

21–30 of 116 posts

Re: Announcing TypeScript 0.9.1

#21

Am justing waiting for them to implement "await".

I think you might be waiting for awhile unfortunately. Implementing await would result in a lot of autogenerated code. Typescript is largely meant to be almost 1:1 with the Javascript it produces.

Anders talks about that problem in this video: http://channel9.msdn.com/Events/Build/2013/9-006

Re: Announcing TypeScript 0.9.1

#22
post #5

I haven't heard much about TypeScript since its original announce. Are any big projects using it? Does anybody have some commentary on their experience using it and where they think the project is going?

My project isn't huge, but larger than it could have been using idiomatic javascript. The scoping with modules and the typing really helped since I'm familiar with C# and having "everything light up" in the IDE. Saved a ton of time letting a compiler catch things instead of writing tests. I tried coffee script, but found the copy/paste option for javascript that I have already written won me over.

There's js2coffee.org to copy paste JavaScript to CoffeeScript.

Re: Announcing TypeScript 0.9.1

#23

I haven't heard much about TypeScript since its original announce. Are any big projects using it? Does anybody have some commentary on their experience using it and where they think the project is going?

The largest project I know using it from what anders has mentioned is xbox music, which is about half a million lines of typescript. In addition the IE11 debugger also is written in typescript.

Re: Announcing TypeScript 0.9.1

#24
I sometimes find myself torn between dynamic typing (great for rapid prototyping) and static typing (great for tooling and compile-time error checks).

I'm a big fan of TypeScript's approach, which gives you the best of both worlds. Start with fully dynamic code to explore the problem space, then add more static guarantees as you firm up your design.

I haven't had occasion to write a big web app recently, but I'm itching to find one so I can put TypeScript through its paces.

Re: Announcing TypeScript 0.9.1

#26
post #9
post #6

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Why are you concerned about this? I didn't see anything in the announcement that would suggest it.

Cause it makes it windows only. EDIT: to add, I like the idea of typescript (it's a much smaller step than compared to something like Dart). But their tooling is all around Visual Studio, which ties you to Windows. I don't dislike Windows, but I want my development tools to be cross platform (which is why I like Sublime Text, Eclipse, and similar tools).

I think he was asking "why are you concerned about this" because there is absolutely no indication that they intend to force Visual Studio with TypeScript.

Re: Announcing TypeScript 0.9.1

#28
Does anyone have experience with using TypeScript with existing libraries like Angular.js?

I know that there are definition files for it [1] (and many other popular libraries), but unfortunately I haven't had the time to check out their quality.

[1] https://github.com/borisyankov/DefinitelyTyped/tree/master/a...

Re: Announcing TypeScript 0.9.1

#29
post #23

I haven't heard much about TypeScript since its original announce. Are any big projects using it? Does anybody have some commentary on their experience using it and where they think the project is going?

The largest project I know using it from what anders has mentioned is xbox music, which is about half a million lines of typescript. In addition the IE11 debugger also is written in typescript.

The TFS web UI is another project that was converted to Typescript.

http://blogs.msdn.com/b/bharry/archive/2012/10/24/typescript...

Post reply on HN