Announcing TypeScript 0.9.1
blogs.msdn.com
Announcing TypeScript 0.9.1
1–10 of 116 posts
Re: Announcing TypeScript 0.9.1
#2Re: Announcing TypeScript 0.9.1
#3Re: Announcing TypeScript 0.9.1
#4I hope that they keep the possibility of running it stand-alone and not force Visual Studio down their users's throats.
Re: Announcing TypeScript 0.9.1
#5I haven't heard much about TypeScript since its original announce. Are any big projects using it? Does anybody have some commentary on their experience using it and where they think the project is going?
The scoping with modules and the typing really helped since I'm familiar with C# and having "everything light up" in the IDE. Saved a ton of time letting a compiler catch things instead of writing tests.
I tried coffee script, but found the copy/paste option for javascript that I have already written won me over.
Re: Announcing TypeScript 0.9.1
#6I hope that they keep the possibility of running it stand-alone and not force Visual Studio down their users's throats.
Re: Announcing TypeScript 0.9.1
#7I hope that they keep the possibility of running it stand-alone and not force Visual Studio down their users's throats.
Re: Announcing TypeScript 0.9.1
#8I haven't heard much about TypeScript since its original announce. Are any big projects using it? Does anybody have some commentary on their experience using it and where they think the project is going?
My project isn't huge, but larger than it could have been using idiomatic javascript. The scoping with modules and the typing really helped since I'm familiar with C# and having "everything light up" in the IDE. Saved a ton of time letting a compiler catch things instead of writing tests. I tried coffee script, but found the copy/paste option for javascript that I have already written won me over.
No longer am I concerned about errant semi-colons or a stupid typo in a method name on an error handling path that a unit test missed.
Re: Announcing TypeScript 0.9.1
#9I hope that they keep the possibility of running it stand-alone and not force Visual Studio down their users's throats.
Why are you concerned about this? I didn't see anything in the announcement that would suggest it.
EDIT: to add, I like the idea of typescript (it's a much smaller step than compared to something like Dart). But their tooling is all around Visual Studio, which ties you to Windows. I don't dislike Windows, but I want my development tools to be cross platform (which is why I like Sublime Text, Eclipse, and similar tools).
Re: Announcing TypeScript 0.9.1
#10I haven't heard much about TypeScript since its original announce. Are any big projects using it? Does anybody have some commentary on their experience using it and where they think the project is going?
My project isn't huge, but larger than it could have been using idiomatic javascript. The scoping with modules and the typing really helped since I'm familiar with C# and having "everything light up" in the IDE. Saved a ton of time letting a compiler catch things instead of writing tests. I tried coffee script, but found the copy/paste option for javascript that I have already written won me over.
And when valid javascript is valid typescript, it seems odd to not opt to use it when the only addition is a compile step to ensure sanity.