"It would make sense that an employer would try to offer a lower salary to an employee it helped move to the United States since that employee also gains the benefit of getting sponsored, but the analysis found the opposite." This makes me want to punch the screen. It is ILLEGAL to pay an engineer on an H-1B less than the median salary for that position, precisely because people were worried that foreign labour would…
The myth of America's missing software engineers
41–50 of 143 posts
Re: The myth of America's missing software engineers
#42Important factor is how many of the "qualified" candidates clear the interviews? The problem is not the lack of people to interview, it's the lack of people who clear interviews.
I can't say I disagree with that statement in and of itself. Yet I believe you are getting few qualified candidates because companies are asking for highly skilled people with a great deal of experience and then only, and my opinion is intentionally, offering well below market wages. This then allows them to scream "there are not enough developers". The whole shtick is just meant to repress wages..
Re: The myth of America's missing software engineers
#43" Bright.com, a California-based company that uses big data analysis to pair jobseekers with employers, released a report last month that showed that the supposed dearth of high-skilled engineers in the United States may be fiction after all. " Which would presumably be a useful result for Bright's business, if it is true, as it would mean that companies simply are not looking hard enough, which is Bright's business.…
In the place of analysis you have put a lot of snark which seems to be analysis. If another company with a different business had posted - one with an incentive to say there is a shortage of high-skilled engineers, like most big companies hiring engineers - would you be implying their claims are false too? If not, you are being partial; if so, your method is just to say that whatever anyone says must be wrong because…
Re: The myth of America's missing software engineers
#44Earlier quoted context omitted.
You took that sentence out of context. This is the full paragraph: > To be sure, using data to argue about contentious policy issues should always prompt skepticism. It's too easy to focus on particular aspects of any data analysis to prove one's point and overlook those items that may raise more questions. ... which is a very valid point.
Since it's too easy to mess up, and all, the obvious solution is just not to use data. It does literally say that using data "should always prompt skepticism" - not conditionally on whether it was done right or not.
Data is basically worthless if you can't trust the methodology behind it.
Re: The myth of America's missing software engineers
#45As someone occasionally involved in hiring, the important question isn't whether we have "enough" software engineers. It's easy to fill seats. The question is whether we have "good enough" software engineers. And, as long as we're trying to improve as a company, we'll always want better engineers.
You're 100% right. Why make it difficult for really smart people to immigrate to the US? Better engineers are always welcome at any company. In any case, there's reason to believe many of educated immigrants will become entrepreneurs and create jobs themselves.
Personally, I think anyone with a 4 year degree should be allowed to get a green card if they can show they have the $$ to live in the US for a year and agree to look for work. Because the way it works now, even if the article is bullshit, it is comically vulnerable to arbitrage [LOL yes, why we do indeed need a 'junior web developer' that knows C so he can understand how our api works...oh, well, we realized after he arrived we needed him to work on this C project that was critical to our infrastructure and is responsible for 100k+/day in revenue while we pay him half of that of the guy that quit] if you can pay a lawyer for an hour.
Just my two cents.
Re: The myth of America's missing software engineers
#46The trouble with this is that no centralized analysis can determine what "qualified" actually means; only an individual employer can determine that. So if they say there are no qualified engineers then that's the end of discussion. Having more intelligent people in the US is a good thing.
So if they say there are no qualified engineers then that's the end of discussion. You really believe that? You can't imagine that, hey maybe these companies gasp lie so they won't have to pay market wages? That some C?O somewhere cares more about the bottom line than hiring qualified local engineers that they can't threaten with deportation?
Re: The myth of America's missing software engineers
#47"It would make sense that an employer would try to offer a lower salary to an employee it helped move to the United States since that employee also gains the benefit of getting sponsored, but the analysis found the opposite." This makes me want to punch the screen. It is ILLEGAL to pay an engineer on an H-1B less than the median salary for that position, precisely because people were worried that foreign labour would…
In the CNN article, it is mentioned that the most requested position is for "computer systems analyst" which "is also a lower-paying job compared to jobs like software engineer and requires only a two-year degree." It is quite possible that some of those analysts are over-qualified for their jobs and should be making software engineer or senior engineer money.
The Government Acountability Office wrote up a report about 2.5 years ago [1] that does mention limited oversight (page 3). The text:
"Elements of the H-1B program that could serve as worker protections
such as the requirement to pay prevailing wages, the visa’s
temporary status, and the cap itself are weakened by
several factors."
Just because it is illegal, doesn't mean it isn't happening.Re: The myth of America's missing software engineers
#48Earlier quoted context omitted.
Who can't negotiate? It's your fault if you can't/won't negotiate. If there is a pool of labor willing to accept a free lunch and campus-like atmosphere, coupled with cheap imported labor, in lieu of perhaps $100,000 in pay, it depresses wages across the entire industry. I'd posit that the reason finance pays more for engineers than STEM is because most of us think that the atmosphere at a finance company will suck a…
I'd never work at EA, either. Although they're the other side of the same economics, because young nerds who don't know any better and like video games will work there for less than an average tech firm, and less still than it would take to get them into finance. As far as people who take low salaries screwing up your salary: If they're willing to do the job for that and they're not appreciably worse than you at that…
Or there could be a collection of people that decide to enter different industries because of this, causing a labor shortage?
Re: The myth of America's missing software engineers
#49I posted this in response to a comment the last time this came up. That article was killed, so I'm reposting: Whereas the reason there are open positions for programmers at high tech companies is that these companies want star programmers Maybe they should try paying like stars. What percentage of engineers that aren't founders or within the first five employees make over $300,000 a year? The money is in Silicon Vall…
And is GS average pay skewed by a 1% of employees who make globs of money into the 10s of millions in total comp? Do the majority of staffers make normalish wages? Admin assistants, IT, operations, etc?
Re: The myth of America's missing software engineers
#50"Qualified applicants" takes on a different meaning if you're looking for someone to crank out a CRUD app or write operating system kernels. For example, we've been looking for an entry-level web developer for almost a year. They actually put "computer science degree" and "2 years experience" on the job ad. We found a pretty smart kid with an associates that blew the interview by mentioning he kept up with industry t…
..as opposed to not keeping up with industry trends at all? Sometimes, I feel like middle management in America is the problem.