Live data from Hacker News

What a 600,000-megapixel-wide picture looks like

oddly-even.com

81–90 of 93 posts

Re: What a 600,000-megapixel-wide picture looks like

#81

Hi, I'm the photographer who made this image. Thank you for all the attention :-) Let me try to answer some of your questions, in no particular order: 1) Here is the original page: http://360gigapixels.com/tokyo-tower-panorama-photo/ also here is a youtube screen capture showing a few highlights, if you are feeling lazy ;) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NboCijiLwmI 2) it is not 600,000 megapixels. It is 600,000 pixe…

Perhaps those people were censored because they were in residential buildings, making them easy to identify.

Re: What a 600,000-megapixel-wide picture looks like

#82
post #77

Hi, I'm the photographer who made this image. Thank you for all the attention :-) Let me try to answer some of your questions, in no particular order: 1) Here is the original page: http://360gigapixels.com/tokyo-tower-panorama-photo/ also here is a youtube screen capture showing a few highlights, if you are feeling lazy ;) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NboCijiLwmI 2) it is not 600,000 megapixels. It is 600,000 pixe…

Hi! Thanks a lot for makeing the Image, truly a great piece! I have a question, actually concerning the mori tower building: Where did you take it from? From the very top where you can go outside? Problem would be, that you couldn't go to the very edge of the building, or were you somehow able to? And, do you maybe have a "behind the scenes" video of some sort, or just a few shots showing how you are working :D? Than…

Have a look around this panorama:

http://www.360cities.net/image/shooting-the-tokyo-gigapixel-...

It will give you a good idea of where on the tower Jeffrey shot the gigapixel from: way out on the edge!

Re: What a 600,000-megapixel-wide picture looks like

#83

Hi, I'm the photographer who made this image. Thank you for all the attention :-) Let me try to answer some of your questions, in no particular order: 1) Here is the original page: http://360gigapixels.com/tokyo-tower-panorama-photo/ also here is a youtube screen capture showing a few highlights, if you are feeling lazy ;) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NboCijiLwmI 2) it is not 600,000 megapixels. It is 600,000 pixe…

>Most of those things would not be embarrassing in other cultures (I think) such as a woman hanging laundry, but Japan is "different".

Why is it culturally embarrassing to hang laundry in Japan?

(Awesome stuff!)

Re: What a 600,000-megapixel-wide picture looks like

#85
post #83

Hi, I'm the photographer who made this image. Thank you for all the attention :-) Let me try to answer some of your questions, in no particular order: 1) Here is the original page: http://360gigapixels.com/tokyo-tower-panorama-photo/ also here is a youtube screen capture showing a few highlights, if you are feeling lazy ;) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NboCijiLwmI 2) it is not 600,000 megapixels. It is 600,000 pixe…

>Most of those things would not be embarrassing in other cultures (I think) such as a woman hanging laundry, but Japan is "different". Why is it culturally embarrassing to hang laundry in Japan? (Awesome stuff!)

> is it culturally embarrassing to hang laundry in Japan?

she was handling underwear which is seen as a private activity.

Re: What a 600,000-megapixel-wide picture looks like

#86
post #77

Hi, I'm the photographer who made this image. Thank you for all the attention :-) Let me try to answer some of your questions, in no particular order: 1) Here is the original page: http://360gigapixels.com/tokyo-tower-panorama-photo/ also here is a youtube screen capture showing a few highlights, if you are feeling lazy ;) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NboCijiLwmI 2) it is not 600,000 megapixels. It is 600,000 pixe…

Hi! Thanks a lot for makeing the Image, truly a great piece! I have a question, actually concerning the mori tower building: Where did you take it from? From the very top where you can go outside? Problem would be, that you couldn't go to the very edge of the building, or were you somehow able to? And, do you maybe have a "behind the scenes" video of some sort, or just a few shots showing how you are working :D? Than…

On the mori tower, I shot it from 4 points around the tower. Another commenter sent a link to a panorama where I'm shooting one of the sections. I shot the same on the other sie, and the other two sections were shot from the ends of the building.

Re: What a 600,000-megapixel-wide picture looks like

#87

Hi, I'm the photographer who made this image. Thank you for all the attention :-) Let me try to answer some of your questions, in no particular order: 1) Here is the original page: http://360gigapixels.com/tokyo-tower-panorama-photo/ also here is a youtube screen capture showing a few highlights, if you are feeling lazy ;) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NboCijiLwmI 2) it is not 600,000 megapixels. It is 600,000 pixe…

Great work! I want to go hunting for myself in the tokyo pictures - when did you shoot them, exactly?

Re: What a 600,000-megapixel-wide picture looks like

#88
post #83

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>Most of those things would not be embarrassing in other cultures (I think) such as a woman hanging laundry, but Japan is "different". Why is it culturally embarrassing to hang laundry in Japan? (Awesome stuff!)

> is it culturally embarrassing to hang laundry in Japan? she was handling underwear which is seen as a private activity.

Ah... of course.

Re: What a 600,000-megapixel-wide picture looks like

#90
post #61
post #50

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I assume that the government has better than normal classified satelite tech, so how do you know what kinds of resolutions are possible?

Atmospheric effects. Atmospheric refraction adds significant noise, fully obscuring features smaller than about 0.25 m. Yes, ground telescopes have ways of cancelling out atmospheric effects, but the required calibration and long exposure is impossible with the orbit of spy satellites.

I don't think it takes long exposure. Ground-based telescopes can make the simplifying assumption that they are looking at static point sources. That makes it easier to correct for camera movement and for optical defects from the lense and the atmosphere.

On the other hand, looking down is a bit easier than looking up because the atmosphere will converge rays looking down, but diverge them looking up. See http://what-if.xkcd.com/32/.

That site also claims that others say Hubble is about as good as the best spy satellites, resolution-wise.

Post reply on HN