Live data from Hacker News

Did Goldman Overstep in Criminally Charging Its Ex-Programmer?

vanityfair.com

21–30 of 228 posts

Re: Did Goldman Overstep in Criminally Charging Its Ex-Programmer?

#21
“He was stringing these computer terms together in ways that made no sense. He didn’t seem to know anything about high-frequency trading or source code.”

Programming is esoteric to common folk. Almost like witchcraft. When things go wrong for villagers, they often burn witches.

They didn't burn witches in the old days because of some moral failing that we've outgrown. They burned them because they were unable to understand that "witches" didn't actually cause plagues.

Re: Did Goldman Overstep in Criminally Charging Its Ex-Programmer?

#23

I was on a jury for a murder trial, and so I have some insight into how juries work. At one point, when I was splitting some hairs and discussing the meaning of some small details from the evidence, one of the other jurors got impatient and reached for the coroner's photo of the victim. "Someone died here, you realize."

Appropriate response: "If we convict the wrong guy, the real murderer goes free, you realize".

Re: Did Goldman Overstep in Criminally Charging Its Ex-Programmer?

#25
The best lesson here:

> The fourth, and final, rule was by far the most important: Don’t say a word to government officials. “The reason you don’t,” he says, “is that, if you do, they can place an agent on a witness stand and he can say anything.”

Aren't you allowed to have a lawyer present in conversations with agents?

Re: Did Goldman Overstep in Criminally Charging Its Ex-Programmer?

#26
I haven't clicked through, but only the government (via prosecutors) can charge anyone with criminal offenses.

Additionally, while private people can suggest charges or report crimes, ultimately they have zero say one way or the other if charges actually get filed.

See also: Apple/DoJ/Gawker, ATT/Apple/DoJ/weev, JSTOR/MIT/aaronsw

Re: Did Goldman Overstep in Criminally Charging Its Ex-Programmer?

#27

On the night of the arrest—without an arrest warrant—Serge waived his right to call a lawyer. He phoned his wife and told her what had happened and that a bunch of F.B.I. agents were on the way to their home to seize their computers, and to please let them in—though they had no search warrant, either. Then he sat down and politely tried to clear up the F.B.I. agent's confusion. "He was completely not interested in th…

That video is right up there with knowing about 83b elections as some of the most valuable information one can possibly possess.

I rewatch it annually and send out mass emails to all my friends and family when I do reminding them to do so as well.

Re: Did Goldman Overstep in Criminally Charging Its Ex-Programmer?

#28
Side question: how do these people with "only the vaguest interest in his fellow human beings" end up with a wife and three kids? It seems to be a common theme amongst articles like this. They always paint the hero-programmer as some kind of rainman figure and then it turns out he has a loving family. Just the usual fictional press nonsense I guess.

EDIT: should always read on before commenting:

"He married a girl and manages to have three kids with her before he figures out he doesn’t really know her."

Re: Did Goldman Overstep in Criminally Charging Its Ex-Programmer?

#29
How does this case not violate the eighth amendment? Or if not that, basic fucking justice and morality. He's lost everything, spent a year in prison, was acquitted of federal charges, and now is being charged by NY State? The justice system is seriously broken.
Post reply on HN