I like the idea of having interface "skins", but I honestly could not tell this one apart from Bootstrap. I would love to see more varying interface styles, not another bootstrap clone.
Ink – Interface Kit
11–20 of 73 posts
Re: Ink – Interface Kit
#12It looks good; You should add your framework to: http://usablica.github.io/front-end-frameworks/compare.html
Re: Ink – Interface Kit
#13Yet another! Foundation, Bootstrap, 960, unsemantic, etc.
Re: Ink – Interface Kit
#14I think this is cool, so I say good job on that front. But I kind of feel like you're trying to introduce yet another low end sedan. There's already hundreds, and I've already purchased one. It's gonna take at least a few more years for me to be ready to shop for a new one.
Re: Ink – Interface Kit
#15How is this different from Bootstrap ( http://twitter.github.io/bootstrap/ )?
Literally JUST a skin. No idea how this crap gets voted up.
Re: Ink – Interface Kit
#16Can we please come up with a better markup for form element grouping than "div.control-group"?
Specifically, HTML has always allowed nesting an inside - and that's more than enough to create either a horizontal or stacked layout. No s needed. And no "for" attribute needed with an unnecessary input ID.
Re: Ink – Interface Kit
#17Can we please come up with a better markup for form element grouping than "div.control-group"? Specifically, HTML has always allowed nesting an inside - and that's more than enough to create either a horizontal or stacked layout. No s needed. And no "for" attribute needed with an unnecessary input ID.
That's a fair point. Although div's are not completely necessary for this purpose from a functional perspective, the standard definitely allows one to understand/create the layout of the page more efficiently.
Re: Ink – Interface Kit
#18How is this different from Bootstrap ( http://twitter.github.io/bootstrap/ )?
Forms is a nice addition over Bootstrap for me.
Re: Ink – Interface Kit
#19As someone who hasn't integrated Bootstrapped before, I have a clean slate to evaluate and use any interface kit that comes along. As long as it's more comprehensive that what's currently out there, it doesn't matter so much to me how much more of an improvement this latest project is over the prior standard.
Re: Ink – Interface Kit
#20Yet another! Foundation, Bootstrap, 960, unsemantic, etc.
[deleted]