Ink – Interface Kit • Hacker News Board

http://ink.sapo.pt/icons#nav-textedit The link for Text Editor Icons is broken because the id for that section is set to nav-web. A copy-paste error most likely.

Re: Ink – Interface Kit

#6

Post by aren55555 » Mon, Jul 29, 2013, 2:16 PM UTC

gregorkas wrote: post #3

How is this different from Bootstrap ( http://twitter.github.io/bootstrap/ )?

Serves the same purpose (building a UI) but seems to have style differences and a few different JS UI plugins.

Re: Ink – Interface Kit

#7

Post by rfnslyr » Mon, Jul 29, 2013, 2:23 PM UTC

gregorkas wrote: post #3

How is this different from Bootstrap ( http://twitter.github.io/bootstrap/ )?

Literally JUST a skin. No idea how this crap gets voted up.

Re: Ink – Interface Kit

#8

Post by JohnDotAwesome » Mon, Jul 29, 2013, 2:33 PM UTC

rfnslyr wrote: post #7

gregorkas wrote: post #3

How is this different from Bootstrap ( http://twitter.github.io/bootstrap/ )?

Literally JUST a skin. No idea how this crap gets voted up.

Is it _literally_ just a skin? Looks like a mostly different codebase.

Compare mixins.less https://github.com/sapo/Ink/blob/develop/less/modules/mixins... https://github.com/twbs/bootstrap/blob/master/less/mixins.le...

Personally, I like it. It's nice to have competition :)

Re: Ink – Interface Kit

#9

Post by rokusho » Mon, Jul 29, 2013, 2:34 PM UTC

It feels to close to Bootstrap without bringing enough new stuff to the table to be worth it. It's nice to see people making alternatives, but it needs to be a lot more developed.

Re: Ink – Interface Kit

#10

Post by ceejayoz » Mon, Jul 29, 2013, 2:35 PM UTC

gregorkas wrote: post #3

How is this different from Bootstrap ( http://twitter.github.io/bootstrap/ )?

At this point, if your CSS framework doesn't start with "why we're different/better than Bootstrap" I'm pretty much out. I skimmed the docs and see very little here that isn't a direct "Bootstrap does that, we'll do that too".