Putting Wolfram Alpha To The Test: Not Super-Impressed (But Here Are 50 Invites)
11–20 of 21 posts
Re: Putting Wolfram Alpha To The Test: Not Super-Impressed (But Here Are 50 Invites)
#12Re: Putting Wolfram Alpha To The Test: Not Super-Impressed (But Here Are 50 Invites)
#13These are the key things every search engine deals with.
Google, Yahoo!, and MS Live compensate for stale data by scheduling their crawlers very cleverly. Google has published a few blog posts a while back about how it does it (I'm sure it's even more improved now).
The breakthrough of W|A is number (3) in my list above. They kick ass and frankly make search much more useful than anything we have now. You're no longer searching for pages that have the info, but getting answers directly. A Cambridge, UK, startup called True Knowledge does this too, and it's impressive (W|A is much better in data presenation though).
So for an alpha product, please do not judge it by have stale or incomplete data. It simply can't have all the data fresh from the get-go. Judge though by how good or bad are the algos that power the search. The data is relatively easy to get hold of when compared to writing awesome analysis code.
Re: Putting Wolfram Alpha To The Test: Not Super-Impressed (But Here Are 50 Invites)
#14seems like lack of current data is it's current achilles heel
I'm going to throw out there that Wolfram|Alpha might scrub it's sources' data more thoroughly. How can you trust unemployment data from a month ago? 2006 may have been some major study by INSERT_MAJOR_ORGANIZATION_HERE.
Re: Putting Wolfram Alpha To The Test: Not Super-Impressed (But Here Are 50 Invites)
#15Of course it's probably not going to return anything relevant when you enter your own name, why should it? It's certainly not Google. I get the feeling the author doesn't understand that.
Re: Putting Wolfram Alpha To The Test: Not Super-Impressed (But Here Are 50 Invites)
#16Wolfram|Alpha is focused on academic use-cases (for now), not searching for your own name or an online newspaper/blog. It is purposely NOT Google.
> Wolfram|Alpha is focused on academic use-cases I have, so far, found it nearly useless academically. (Computational biology, to be specific.) Perhaps it will improve with time.
(In fact, I'd open that question up to any other similar discipline.)
Re: Putting Wolfram Alpha To The Test: Not Super-Impressed (But Here Are 50 Invites)
#17Re: Putting Wolfram Alpha To The Test: Not Super-Impressed (But Here Are 50 Invites)
#18Wolfram|Alpha is focused on academic use-cases (for now), not searching for your own name or an online newspaper/blog. It is purposely NOT Google.
I agree, trying to out-Google Google is a bad idea.
Google began in 1997 or 98. I heard of it in 2000 but did not start using it til 2002/2003.
Re: Putting Wolfram Alpha To The Test: Not Super-Impressed (But Here Are 50 Invites)
#19[1] http://blog.wolframalpha.com/2009/05/12/the-computers-poweri...
Re: Putting Wolfram Alpha To The Test: Not Super-Impressed (But Here Are 50 Invites)
#20I am quite interested what is the business model for Wolfram Alpha. It seems that is rather focused on data analysis then searching. It might be tough to rely solely on ads, but perhaps companies may be willing to pay to run their computational engine against their own data. It could be a great tool for exploring data. The queries that we see right now could be hard to monetize. Lack of business cases and probably im…
1. sponsors (in the sidebars)
2. subscriptions (the main benefit being that you get to upload and run your own data)
[1] video: http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/events/2009/04/wolfram