Earlier quoted context omitted.
something that was not necessary. Init scripts can be nice and clean [1]. And yes, I'm all for a init replacement. Something new, nice and clean. But I take the shell script hackery over a dbus dependency. But that's just my personal opinion. I have neither used it nor looked at the code, but [2] seems to be what I want. It's by the libdietc author, so i expect the code to be small, elegant and not maintained very we…
That's again a myth. There is no dbus dependency. You can use dbus to do activation but you don't have to. Now, there is a dependency on libdbus which just means systemd is using the dbus serialisation format for its ipc (which, I repeat, don't have to happen over dbus).
http://0pointer.de/blog/projects/the-biggest-myths.html
>When you build systemd, it only requires three dependencies: glibc, libcap and dbus.
In the paragraph "bloated".