Earlier quoted context omitted.
On cancer outcomes, the US outranks many (most?) of the countries that beat it on life expectancy. And, as pointed out downthread, life expectancy is a dodgy stat; it's heavily weighted by infant mortality, which isn't uniformly measured, and by accidental and violent deaths which, while tragic and perhaps symptomatic of other US problems, don't implicate our health care system.
You have to be careful about cancer statistics, because in many cases the US diagnoses early-stage cancers that would never get recorded in other countries. Some of those cancers never progress to the point of being life-threatening, making the survival stats misleading. Others do but because they're recorded earlier US patients are recorded as surviving for longe when in fact they're just being diagnosed ealier and…
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lead_time_bias
Gil Welch at Dartmouth is one of the experts in unnecessary medical screening and lead time bias. He's written numerous academic and media articles, especially regarding lung, breast, and prostate cancer screening. Also an amazing public speaker: