Earlier quoted context omitted.
Edit: It has been (correctly) pointed out downthread that I have helped hijacking a very personal post for political point scoring - which I think is fair. However we lack a decent history function in HN so I leave it here otherwise the thread will read strangely. Thank you - as a Brit I read this too. I cycled through emotions - fear and sympathy for the diagnosis, hope as some of our best professionals consider new…
The UK has notoriously poor cancer outcomes. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1560849/UK-cancer-sur...
http://politix.topix.com/homepage/7019-us-is-27th-in-the-wor...
and the paper from which the figure is taken
http://jama.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleID=1710486
Those data show that the USA ranks far below the UK on Years of Life Lost due to several cancers. I don't see how that's consistent with your claim. [Edit: actually, YLL is an incidence statistic, whereas parent's claim is that survival statistics are higher in the US, which the sources I've found agree with.]
The Telegraph is a right-leaning paper and is well known to be anti-NHS. Please; being economically laissez-faire as people are on HN are is not incompatible with supporting state provision of healthcare, along with the other things a state provides. It's sad to see libertarians / laissez-faire economics people bashing the NHS by quoting stories cherry-picked by right wing media sources. It's just not something we need disagree about.