Microsoft vs. MikeRoweSoft
11–20 of 26 posts
Re: Microsoft vs. MikeRoweSoft
#12Am I missing something? The wikipedia article claims he intentionally bought the domain because it sounded like Microsoft. The domain very clearly infringed on Microsoft's trademark. Microsoft offered to repay him the cost of buying the domain name (which they are under no legal obligation to do). I don't really get why Microsoft is the bad guy here (and I'm no particular fan of the company).
Re: Microsoft vs. MikeRoweSoft
#13Well this is kind of weird to see here. Especially since it happened almost 10 years ago. I am Mike Rowe. I can answer any questions if people want. I did an AMA on reddit in 2009 as well http://www.reddit.com/r/IAmA/comments/ajsih/i_am_the_guy_who... .
Re: Microsoft vs. MikeRoweSoft
#14Well this is kind of weird to see here. Especially since it happened almost 10 years ago. I am Mike Rowe. I can answer any questions if people want. I did an AMA on reddit in 2009 as well http://www.reddit.com/r/IAmA/comments/ajsih/i_am_the_guy_who... .
I just wanted to say, you are my hero.
Re: Microsoft vs. MikeRoweSoft
#15Am I missing something? The wikipedia article claims he intentionally bought the domain because it sounded like Microsoft. The domain very clearly infringed on Microsoft's trademark. Microsoft offered to repay him the cost of buying the domain name (which they are under no legal obligation to do). I don't really get why Microsoft is the bad guy here (and I'm no particular fan of the company).
When a multi-billion dollar corporation thumps a 12th grader over the head with its legal department, people are going to call foul.
Re: Microsoft vs. MikeRoweSoft
#16Well this is kind of weird to see here. Especially since it happened almost 10 years ago. I am Mike Rowe. I can answer any questions if people want. I did an AMA on reddit in 2009 as well http://www.reddit.com/r/IAmA/comments/ajsih/i_am_the_guy_who... .
Re: Microsoft vs. MikeRoweSoft
#17Am I missing something? The wikipedia article claims he intentionally bought the domain because it sounded like Microsoft. The domain very clearly infringed on Microsoft's trademark. Microsoft offered to repay him the cost of buying the domain name (which they are under no legal obligation to do). I don't really get why Microsoft is the bad guy here (and I'm no particular fan of the company).
When a multi-billion dollar corporation thumps a 12th grader over the head with its legal department, people are going to call foul.
Just sounds like the public got riled up for no good reason.
Re: Microsoft vs. MikeRoweSoft
#18Well this is kind of weird to see here. Especially since it happened almost 10 years ago. I am Mike Rowe. I can answer any questions if people want. I did an AMA on reddit in 2009 as well http://www.reddit.com/r/IAmA/comments/ajsih/i_am_the_guy_who... .
I just wanted to say, you are my hero.
Re: Microsoft vs. MikeRoweSoft
#19Earlier quoted context omitted.
I just wanted to say, you are my hero.
Why is he your hero?
Also my original comment was half joking, but the sentiment remains.
Re: Microsoft vs. MikeRoweSoft
#20Well this is kind of weird to see here. Especially since it happened almost 10 years ago. I am Mike Rowe. I can answer any questions if people want. I did an AMA on reddit in 2009 as well http://www.reddit.com/r/IAmA/comments/ajsih/i_am_the_guy_who... .
For the first paragraph of the article, I believed that you were the host of Dirty Jobs...