Microsoft vs. MikeRoweSoft
en.wikipedia.org
Microsoft vs. MikeRoweSoft
1–10 of 26 posts
Re: Microsoft vs. MikeRoweSoft
#2Re: Microsoft vs. MikeRoweSoft
#3Slow news day? How did this make it to the front page?
Re: Microsoft vs. MikeRoweSoft
#4Slow news day? How did this make it to the front page?
Re: Microsoft vs. MikeRoweSoft
#5Re: Microsoft vs. MikeRoweSoft
#6Panavision Int'l, L.P. v. Toeppen http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dennis_Toeppen - company Panavision vs. a domain squatter ostensibly showing pictures of Pana, Illinois
People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals v. Doughney http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/People_for_the_Ethical_Treatmen... - PETA vs a guy who registered peta.org as 'People Eating Tasty Animals'
Lamaparello v. Falwell http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lamparello_v._Falwell - fallwell.com mistyped domain used to criticize preacher Jerry Falwell
Re: Microsoft vs. MikeRoweSoft
#7Slow news day? How did this make it to the front page?
Following the case it was suggested by Struan Robertson – editor of Out-Law.com – that Microsoft had little choice but to pursue the issue once it had come to light or they would have risked weakening their trademark. This view was also espoused by ZDNet, who noted that had Microsoft knowingly ignored Rowe's site, the company would have risked losing the right to fight future trademark infringements.
Re: Microsoft vs. MikeRoweSoft
#8Re: Microsoft vs. MikeRoweSoft
#9Re: Microsoft vs. MikeRoweSoft
#10Slow news day? How did this make it to the front page?