SML#: a new Standard ML family programming language
pllab.riec.tohoku.ac.jp
SML#: a new Standard ML family programming language
1–10 of 27 posts
Re: SML#: a new Standard ML family programming language
#2Re: SML#: a new Standard ML family programming language
#3Strange choice of name given that it doesn't build on Microsoft's CLI at all.
Re: SML#: a new Standard ML family programming language
#4Strange choice of name given that it doesn't build on Microsoft's CLI at all.
You mean CLR?
Re: SML#: a new Standard ML family programming language
#5[1] http://www.pllab.riec.tohoku.ac.jp/smlsharp/docs/1.0/en/Ch4....
Re: SML#: a new Standard ML family programming language
#6Strange choice of name given that it doesn't build on Microsoft's CLI at all.
http://www.pllab.riec.tohoku.ac.jp/smlsharp/docs/1.0/en/Ch1....
It predates it, actually.
Re: SML#: a new Standard ML family programming language
#7Nevertheless, the thing I like most at SML# is the excellent FFI. You can just pass SML-records or SML-functions to C. SML# is very powerful if you code your applications in SML and C.
Re: SML#: a new Standard ML family programming language
#8Re: SML#: a new Standard ML family programming language
#9Re: SML#: a new Standard ML family programming language
#10sorry to ask, but who uses SML nowadays and for what do they use it? (I know about it's descendants or languages influenced/inspired by it, like OCaml, F# and the less related Haskell, but nothing hits the news about SML projects.)
Usage of SML results in very short, readable and efficient programs, so I wonder why there is only so little industry adoption.