How is this an interesting news ? Because my comment isn't clear. This is not an interesting news. A link to the twitter status or the github status ( https://status.github.com/messages ) would be relevant in that case. not just some link to a third party telling us it's down. Yeah thank you. I could have notice it on my own....
Github.com is down
11–20 of 56 posts
Re: Github.com is down
#12How is this an interesting news ? Because my comment isn't clear. This is not an interesting news. A link to the twitter status or the github status ( https://status.github.com/messages ) would be relevant in that case. not just some link to a third party telling us it's down. Yeah thank you. I could have notice it on my own....
Probably because they said they are under a large ddos attack? :-? I wonder why would someone do something like this? It's not like github is evil or anything... it's just a really cool and useful tool for coders. It helped a lot of people better their skills and knowledge. Why would someone attack it? (I am genuinely interested in this as I can't think of a reason someone would do something like this)
Re: Github.com is down
#13Re: Github.com is down
#14Earlier quoted context omitted.
Probably because they said they are under a large ddos attack? :-? I wonder why would someone do something like this? It's not like github is evil or anything... it's just a really cool and useful tool for coders. It helped a lot of people better their skills and knowledge. Why would someone attack it? (I am genuinely interested in this as I can't think of a reason someone would do something like this)
No they dont. The link just says, github is down, nothing else, an interesting news would be a link to the twitter post.
Re: Github.com is down
#15Re: Github.com is down
#16How is this an interesting news ? Because my comment isn't clear. This is not an interesting news. A link to the twitter status or the github status ( https://status.github.com/messages ) would be relevant in that case. not just some link to a third party telling us it's down. Yeah thank you. I could have notice it on my own....
Because tragically, most people have all their eggs in one github shaped basket. Git on it's own doesn't suffer from the issue of scary downtime (occasionally repo corruption...), but people have bought deeply into the value-added ecosystem that github throws over the top of it. It's a show-stopper for them.
However, the library I'm working with is hosted on GitHub, their doxygen is on GitHub, their wiki is on GitHub, and I don't have a local version of either of those, which is now pretty annoying.
Re: Github.com is down
#17https://status.github.com/messages is a better place to keep up with news like that.
edit that's not supposed to be as snarkey as it sounds reading it back :-)
edit again The reason for this intuition is that I assume that not being able to reach service.com could indicate a DNS problem. Possibly from the comments below I need to go and read a DNS book :-)
Re: Github.com is down
#18@githubstatus: Working with our upstream providers to mitigate a rather large DDoS at the moment.
Re: Github.com is down
#19I've noticed recently how frequently there are service issues with Github, many times service has been disrupted because of DDoS attacks and similar malicious activity.
Re: Github.com is down
#20https://status.github.com/messages is a better place to keep up with news like that.
My intuition would be that status.service.com is not a useful place to look if service.com is down... edit that's not supposed to be as snarkey as it sounds reading it back :-) edit again The reason for this intuition is that I assume that not being able to reach service.com could indicate a DNS problem. Possibly from the comments below I need to go and read a DNS book :-)
These sites are often hosted away from the main service, and thus available even when problems occur.