Live data from Hacker News

A Low-Tech Mosquito Deterrent

nytimes.com

71–80 of 195 posts

Re: A Low-Tech Mosquito Deterrent

#71

I wonder what the impact of completely eliminating mosquitoes from the ecosystem would be. If we could quantify that, and the outcome was enticing, we could release a bunch of genetically modified sterile mosquitoes that would quickly erase whole populations.

It would take quite the concerted effort over a long period of time. Mosquito eggs can lay dormant for 10-15 years.

Re: A Low-Tech Mosquito Deterrent

#73

I wonder what the impact of completely eliminating mosquitoes from the ecosystem would be. If we could quantify that, and the outcome was enticing, we could release a bunch of genetically modified sterile mosquitoes that would quickly erase whole populations.

I wonder what the impact of completely eliminating mosquitoes from the ecosystem would be. A scientist has considered that issue, and the conclusion is that we could all live quite happily without any mosquitoes in the world. http://www.nature.com/news/2010/100721/full/466432a.html

Janet Fang is an intern in Nature's Washington DC office.

Re: A Low-Tech Mosquito Deterrent

#74

Estate design in the colonial and antebellum Southeast, where malaria was a huge problem until the 20th century, was arguably designed to maximize breezes and drafts: be on hilltops, surrounded by mostly open lawns without much shade, with tall, open windows.

Maximizing breeze was actually more about keeping cool than getting rid of mosquitos. Besides, sometimes the breeze would die down and you've got the same old problem. Mosquito nets were available back then :

http://www.nottoway.com/html/nottoway-plantation-history.htm

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/aia/part4/4i3101.html

Re: A Low-Tech Mosquito Deterrent

#75

Personally I'd love to have an auto-aiming laser that detects and fries any nearby mosquito. The poor critters wouldn't stand a chance.

I had to get too tree huggy but mosquitos are a pretty key food source for others. So a fan is great in that it works well and doesn't do too much harm to the food chain.

Re: A Low-Tech Mosquito Deterrent

#77
post #53
post #29

Spend a summer up in the Yukon or Alaska if you want to see solid walls of ravenous mosquitoes. I get bitten while riding my bike, bitten while my arm is out of the car window driving at 30km/h, and bitten through jeans. 100% DEET (you can get it in Alaska) does the trick for about 30 minutes before you have to re-apply - and it's nasty stuff. This past weekend I was camping at a music festival and slapped my arm cas…

Wow, this is not something I knew about Alaska. I did a simple google image search for 'Alaska mosquitoes' and that is plain scary.

Not living North enough ;)

This is mostly a problem further South and West in Alaska. The higher up you go, the colder it is to the point you don't get that many insects at all.

Re: A Low-Tech Mosquito Deterrent

#78
post #51

awesome stuff NY TImes. You just wrote an article about something every 4 year old in India (and every other tropical country) is well aware of

I'm in Alabama, and I didn't know this despite the huge summer mosquito problem we have in the deep south. But I'm also lucky enough to have A+ blood.

Re: A Low-Tech Mosquito Deterrent

#79
post #70

Although it isn't common knowledge, the recommended best practice for avoiding ticks and other bugs is soaking your clothes in Permethrin: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W3sGvZE3rh4 It isn't very well absorbed through the skin so it has an extremely low toxicity when used in this way, as long as you don't breathe it in or let it get on your skin while it's still wet. It's much more effective and less toxic than DEET,…

> Also don't ever mix it with DEET, because the combination is neurotoxic. Holy crap. I must know 100 people who regularly wear Permethrin-treated clothes and then spray on DEET repellent. I had no idea it was dangerous. (FWIW, I avoid them both due to general conservatism when it comes to toxic chemicals, especially when the stakes are low -- i.e., the worst-case is itching and not malaria.)

I started doing it only because I've already gotten bitten by two ticks this year and have found another half dozen on me. I'm only outside a few hours a week collecting mushrooms though, I'm not lying with it pressed against my skin for ten hours straight in a hunting blind or doing anything that would cause me to sweat excessively. But yeah, at least in the Northeast it's gotten to the point where going out into the woods wearing shorts is probably far more dangerous than having unprotected sex with random people, at least as far as we can tell based on the limited tick infection statistics.

Re: A Low-Tech Mosquito Deterrent

#80
post #70

Although it isn't common knowledge, the recommended best practice for avoiding ticks and other bugs is soaking your clothes in Permethrin: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W3sGvZE3rh4 It isn't very well absorbed through the skin so it has an extremely low toxicity when used in this way, as long as you don't breathe it in or let it get on your skin while it's still wet. It's much more effective and less toxic than DEET,…

> Also don't ever mix it with DEET, because the combination is neurotoxic. Holy crap. I must know 100 people who regularly wear Permethrin-treated clothes and then spray on DEET repellent. I had no idea it was dangerous. (FWIW, I avoid them both due to general conservatism when it comes to toxic chemicals, especially when the stakes are low -- i.e., the worst-case is itching and not malaria.)

The worst case of a tick bite is far more serious than itching.
Post reply on HN