Live data from Hacker News

Ask HN: Review my website

hottweeters.com

11–20 of 35 posts

Re: Ask HN: Review my website

#11
post #7

The profiles are choosen randomly, this is hard that I know one of them, won't it better that the user enter a profile name and then rate it. Or better idea, display popular profiles

What if the user put in their own twitter ID and then rated their friends?

Re: Ask HN: Review my website

#12

The hot-or-not craze at least had the decency to allow you to opt-in for judgment.

point taken. this is a super beta app and many of the desired features were not developed. I wanted to release early and get feedback right away. Would an opt-out be satisfactory?

I agree with sanj. It has to be opt-in. I realize that's probably a bummer, but Twitshirt recently got into some hot water for pretty much the same dynamic, it was opt-out, and people were like, "how am I even supposed to know about this site?!?" There was a big backlash, they took the site down until it was only opt-in.

Plus, the nature of your site, unlike say favrd (which is not opt-out, but you'd only appear there if people loved your tweet, and would never appear there if they didn't) is something people naturally feel self-conscious about, appearance and attractiveness.

I do think the functionality and design is really nice though, you did a great job.

Re: Ask HN: Review my website

#13
post #7

The profiles are choosen randomly, this is hard that I know one of them, won't it better that the user enter a profile name and then rate it. Or better idea, display popular profiles

Liked the idea of starting with several hundred popular profiles (with the ability to submit your own for review). If I was a model or celeb using Twitter, I could see Hot Tweeter being a method for building an audience with teenagers.

Re: Ask HN: Review my website

#14

Earlier quoted context omitted.

point taken. this is a super beta app and many of the desired features were not developed. I wanted to release early and get feedback right away. Would an opt-out be satisfactory?

I agree with sanj. It has to be opt-in. I realize that's probably a bummer, but Twitshirt recently got into some hot water for pretty much the same dynamic, it was opt-out, and people were like, "how am I even supposed to know about this site?!?" There was a big backlash, they took the site down until it was only opt-in. Plus, the nature of your site, unlike say favrd (which is not opt-out, but you'd only appear ther…

Maybe send the person a message saying "please accept this nomination for being wicked hot." Appeals to vanity tend to work.

Re: Ask HN: Review my website

#15
There have been to many things that try to just take hot or not and bring it to a new network. This might be a short lived fad, but I think people that really enjoyed this would end up using something like hotornot in the long run. I could be wrong but I am not sure of the staying power of the site.

I also agree with others it needs to be opt-in

Re: Ask HN: Review my website

#16

The hot-or-not craze at least had the decency to allow you to opt-in for judgment.

Opt-in would also help narrow the profiles to real photos of people. I mean, that logo for the corporate account was hot but I'm not sure if that's what you're looking for.

You'd also have fewer profiles, giving the chance for more votes for top hotties.

And you'd have a better group of people to market dating offers to... :-)

Re: Ask HN: Review my website

#17
Personally, this disgusts me.

We should express admiration for people who earn it, by doing admirable things and being admirable people. Being "hot" is not a valid criterion for judging people.

And, no, it's not "just fun." I don't see how anyone could enjoy participating in this kind of misjustice.

Post reply on HN