Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

DuckDuckGo Direct queries per day (28 day average)

duckduckgo.com

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

61–70 of 173 posts

Re: DuckDuckGo Direct queries per day (28 day average)

#61

Post by DoggettCK »

lostlogin wrote: post #55
ck2 wrote: post #16

I have to admit I was skeptical about DDG chances but hard work and being in right place at the right time with privacy has given it the success it deserves. (and it's written in perl of all things) ps. bonus points for deleting eHow from results

I didn't realise they had done that to ehow. I wonder if they could kill some of the region specific crap. If you search for a company here in Auckland you get these junk sites (localist, hot frog, finda) that have out of data that's been scraped an age ago and for some reason ranks high. This would probably be a deciding factor in browser choice for me.

I didn't either. Disclaimer: I work for Demand Media on another property (Pluck), and have only been here about 10 months. I do know a few people on the various teams that do work with eHow and the titling algorithms, though.

Looks like that was in early 2011, before Panda came and nearly wiped eHow out, and over a year before I started. After that, they made a concerted effort to fix their algorithms and focus on providing good, non-automated content. Are they still considered a content farm to be avoided these days?

Re: DuckDuckGo Direct queries per day (28 day average)

#62

Post by sdoowpilihp »

Skalman wrote: post #33
sdoowpilihp wrote: post #27

I really like duck duck go. I just wish they would register ddg.cm so I don't have to type out the whole url. I would register it myself and forward it if it wasn't for the fact that cm registrations cost nearly 100 dollars.

Try http://ddg.gg/ .

thanks!

Re: DuckDuckGo Direct queries per day (28 day average)

#63

Post by boyter »

denis1 wrote: post #15
throwaway420 wrote: post #11

Earlier quoted context omitted.

To each his own, but I think the name is endearing and cute. I've been using DuckDuckGo as my primary search engine ever since the NSA fallout came, and the results are surprisingly usable for most common tasks. In some cases they feel better than Google because I'm seeing some useful sites that Google doesn't ordinarily show. The only area where DuckDuckGo searches have been lacking for me is in finding useful techn…

From my experience, code search is not that bad. Usually the relevant SO posts are on top (maybe even "featured"). I've encountered this problem on obscure code searches though.

Out of curiosity are you getting good code search results in the zero click box or the general search results?

Re: DuckDuckGo Direct queries per day (28 day average)

#65

Post by _delirium »

DoggettCK wrote: post #61
lostlogin wrote: post #55

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I didn't realise they had done that to ehow. I wonder if they could kill some of the region specific crap. If you search for a company here in Auckland you get these junk sites (localist, hot frog, finda) that have out of data that's been scraped an age ago and for some reason ranks high. This would probably be a deciding factor in browser choice for me.

I didn't either. Disclaimer: I work for Demand Media on another property (Pluck), and have only been here about 10 months. I do know a few people on the various teams that do work with eHow and the titling algorithms, though. Looks like that was in early 2011, before Panda came and nearly wiped eHow out, and over a year before I started. After that, they made a concerted effort to fix their algorithms and focus on pr…

I think eHow managed to build up a certain reservoir of whatever the opposite of brand loyalty is among techies, so there's some lingering effect. These days I personally don't think eHow is uniquely bad. I don't think it on average has particularly great content (there are a handful of very good entries, but they're unusual), but it's not spam, or at least not more spammy than seems to be the norm in large-scale commercial media properties. A lot of it is just run-of-the-mill mediocre content on popular keywords, vaguely like About.com or the array of recipe sites, or (with some tilt towards current events) the kind of stuff published by Gawker, HuffPo, Cracked, etc.

Re: DuckDuckGo Direct queries per day (28 day average)

#66

Post by fear91 »

Good. Google monopoly is bad for everyone except their shareholders.

I'd love the search market to be split into 3-4 entities with similiar market share - not one getting 80-90% of the cake. Google extracts way too much value out of web traffic, killing the small business - and this phenomenon increases quarter by quarter in its intensity.

Re: DuckDuckGo Direct queries per day (28 day average)

#67

Post by mike-cardwell »

cinquemb wrote: post #36
jmilkbal wrote: post #30

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Nope, it's just a redirect to Google with your query filled in for the appropriate query string argument. If you want to use Google privately, use Start Page ( http://startpage.com ) or Ixquick ( http://ixquick.com ).

The query from ddg to startpage is !sp and to Ixquick is !ix

"!s" also works for startpage

Re: DuckDuckGo Direct queries per day (28 day average)

#68

Post by DoggettCK »

_delirium wrote: post #65
DoggettCK wrote: post #61

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I didn't either. Disclaimer: I work for Demand Media on another property (Pluck), and have only been here about 10 months. I do know a few people on the various teams that do work with eHow and the titling algorithms, though. Looks like that was in early 2011, before Panda came and nearly wiped eHow out, and over a year before I started. After that, they made a concerted effort to fix their algorithms and focus on pr…

I think eHow managed to build up a certain reservoir of whatever the opposite of brand loyalty is among techies, so there's some lingering effect. These days I personally don't think eHow is uniquely bad. I don't think it on average has particularly great content (there are a handful of very good entries, but they're unusual), but it's not spam, or at least not more spammy than seems to be the norm in large-scale com…

To be fair, they own Cracked, too.

On the plus side, I think they're going to use my team's Hackathon project on eHow to replace all the irrelevant remnant ads with relevant, related ones, and clean it up a bit.

Re: DuckDuckGo Direct queries per day (28 day average)

#69

Post by samstave »

shmerl wrote: post #37
carb wrote: post #23

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's a play on the name of a popular children's game. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duck,_duck,_goose

I've never heard of this game. I thought that the name hints to the duck test: "if it walks like a duck, swims like a duck, and quacks like a duck, then it probably is a duck." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duck_test I.e. that Duck Duck Go is what it looks it is - it's a search engine. And not some tool which secretly harvests data of its users for its own benefit.

> I.e. that Duck Duck Go is what it looks it is - it's a search engine. And not some tool which secretly harvests data of its users for its own benefit.

Well, from this point on both are now true. You're assumption is fantastic. (assuming DDG actually STAYS that way!

Re: DuckDuckGo Direct queries per day (28 day average)

#70

Post by spudlyo »

stevelaz wrote: post #52
ck2 wrote: post #16

I have to admit I was skeptical about DDG chances but hard work and being in right place at the right time with privacy has given it the success it deserves. (and it's written in perl of all things) ps. bonus points for deleting eHow from results

Wow, that's good to see perl 'still' being used by someone that big. I didn't believe you to begin with but to quote the wikipedia article: "The search engine is written in Perl and runs on nginx, FreeBSD and Linux."

Booking.com is a large online travel agency which is pretty popular in Europe. From a recent job description:

Due to our continuing growth we are in search of Perl Developers for our headquarters in Amsterdam, the Netherlands. We use Perl, Apache, mod_perl, MySQL, Memcache, JavaScript, Git, Linux & more. We do agile software development based on scrum.

Post reply on HN