Live data from Hacker News

Doug Engelbart has died

ietf.org

51–60 of 99 posts

Re: Doug Engelbart has died

#51
post #48

Many years ago, before the creation of the Web, a small group of us used to meet at a little wooden church just off the Stanford campus to discuss a little-known idea called nanotechnology. Eric Drexler, Ralph Merkle, a couple of Stanford post-docs and a few others met just to talk. At some point, Eric and his then-wife Christine decided that the message was getting out too slowly, so they created the Foresight Insti…

Excellent, thanks for posting. I shall use this tomorrow with students

Re: Doug Engelbart has died

#55
post #48

Many years ago, before the creation of the Web, a small group of us used to meet at a little wooden church just off the Stanford campus to discuss a little-known idea called nanotechnology. Eric Drexler, Ralph Merkle, a couple of Stanford post-docs and a few others met just to talk. At some point, Eric and his then-wife Christine decided that the message was getting out too slowly, so they created the Foresight Insti…

Treasure that forever! And let it be a lesson in humility for us all.

Re: Doug Engelbart has died

#56

If you've never watched the retrospectively-named "Mother of All Demos", it's an extraordinary document of current-day technology that was somehow done in 1968. There are parts that just seem "wrong" — as seemingly-anachronistic as if Don Draper used a PowerPoint. Yet, there it is. http://archive.org/details/XD300-23_68HighlightsAResearchCnt... Edit: link had been to http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yJDv-zdhzMY but a u…

In the demo video, there are some noises in the background, I'm assuming from his workstation -- rather pleasant and atmospheric. Anyone know what they are? Is it a transmission artifact? Feedback intended for the user (maybe related to the chorded keyboard)? I've read several accounts of this presentation ( one is in _What the Dormouse Said_ ), but don't recall an explanation.

It's not intended. It's clock and/or data-signals that leaks and has gotten amplified, if you look at it in an oscillator you will probably see a square or sawtooth wave at around 1KHz. You might even be able to read that data...

Re: Doug Engelbart has died

#58

He predicted 'The Cloud' in 1976 and we're just catching up now, "Engelbart slipped into relative obscurity after 1976. Several of his researchers became alienated from him and left his organization for Xerox PARC, in part due to frustration, and in part due to differing views of the future of computing. Engelbart saw the future in collaborative, networked, timeshare (client-server) computers, which younger programme…

He didn't predict the cloud, he basically predicted that the way things were then (timeshared system with dumb terminals) was the way it was always going to be. So he wasn't predicting anything, it was already there. You might be able to say that he predicted it would grow to have terminals everywhere but that is more just looking at normal growth if you assumed the current way of doing things is the way it would always be done.

We're not catching up, we're going back to it. Just this time we have dumb terminals just as powerful as the server that is doing things but relegated to doing nothing but displaying markup. It wouldn't surprise me if cost of the terminal compared to the cost of a central server at the time factored into his views.

The man was amazing, it is not often that one man can make such a impact on the everyday lives of so many, but in this case he missed where computing was going. Oddly, his creation of the mouse made personal computers more accessible to everyone.

Re: Doug Engelbart has died

#59
If you are an IxD or UX guy, you really owe it to yourself to read "Designing interactions" by Bill Moggridge. In it, Doug Engelbart is interviewed for an entire chapter regarding how he and some other guys designed the mouse. Very interesting stuff.

Re: Doug Engelbart has died

#60
post #44

A long time ago, 1995 or 1996, I fooled around with software that was written by one of Engelbart's team. It promised to augment the person running the program, to do for their brain what word-processing did for text. It was darn nifty, but a bit beyond me at the time. Couldn't get my boss interested, and I moved on. Does anyone have a clue what that could have been called? Edit: HyPerform, by N. Dean Meyer. I never…

May I ask what search terms you used?

I tentatively thought it was "TheBrain", but that's a bit later, and I was working out if there's any link between Harlan Hugh and Engelbart.

Post reply on HN