The play-slick results seem to be missing. Was there some sort of problem?
Frameworks Round 6
11–20 of 135 posts
Re: Frameworks Round 6
#12Thanks for posting this, amarsahinovic. This is the latest round of our ongoing project to benchmark the performance of fundamental services provided by modern web application frameworks. With the continued contributions of the developer community, the number of frameworks and platforms included is now 74! Round 6 also adds the often-requested plaintext test with HTTP pipelining (thanks in large part to William Gloze…
Luminus appears to be a clojure framework, not a php framework. Thanks again for posting these tests.
Oops! My mistake in classifying. Many apologies to fans of Luminus. I've just corrected this.
Re: Frameworks Round 6
#13Does anyone have more info on "cpoll-cppsp"? Hearing about it for the first time, it seems to be smoking all the other frameworks.
Re: Frameworks Round 6
#14Nice, Some solutions are quite fast , but as soon as the database needs to perform heavy stuffs , well the perfs decrease dramatically. The really bottleneck seems to be the database in most cases. However ,some frameworks are basically quite slow.
Re: Frameworks Round 6
#15Wonderful, thanks for the continuous updates. I hope you will keep gaining momentum around this initiative; having a solid community-supported set of benchmarks which routinely improves would be a true asset.
By the way, I would like to offer a UX suggestion: it would be nice if you could select one or more frameworks and have them highlighted in the result listings, so as to be able to notice their relative position at a glance.
Re: Frameworks Round 6
#16The play-slick results seem to be missing. Was there some sort of problem?
I had not named it uniquely. I've changed its name to "play-slick." Thanks for pointing that out!
Re: Frameworks Round 6
#17I'm really surprised at the performance of C#... honest no-flame question: how is possible it that Python is beating C#? I've been out of the .NET world for several years, almost a decade, but I always assumed they would be at Java level performance. edit add: This is really fantastic work
I guess you need to change the Hardware to "Win" to see it shining.
Indeed, mono performance isn't great. That is the problem with C#, you need ultimately to run it on IIS for web platform deployment, sadly under anything else it is rather slow.
Also these tests are a bit unfair, as I think they give benefit in some areas to frameworks that cache by default, rather than by request.
Ultimately, what I want to know is total cost, that means hardware, licenses / support agreements, development time, developer ease of hiring.
That isn't to say these aren't interesting, but they are rather apples to oranges. As I posted in the other flamebate thread about MS stack > *, I have set a note in my calandar to help improve the example for MVC.Net (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5976540). Hopefully I will be able to come then when not in an exclusive agreement, they suck I know, but it pays my mortgage!
Re: Frameworks Round 6
#18I'm really surprised at the performance of C#... honest no-flame question: how is possible it that Python is beating C#? I've been out of the .NET world for several years, almost a decade, but I always assumed they would be at Java level performance. edit add: This is really fantastic work
I guess you need to change the Hardware to "Win" to see it shining.
Even then it tends to run behind Go and Node.js in most tests. Once Round 7 includes MSSQL we'll see a more accurate picture.
Re: Frameworks Round 6
#19Wonderful, thanks for the continuous updates. I hope you will keep gaining momentum around this initiative; having a solid community-supported set of benchmarks which routinely improves would be a true asset. By the way, I would like to offer a UX suggestion: it would be nice if you could select one or more frameworks and have them highlighted in the result listings, so as to be able to notice their relative position…
Thanks for the feedback. The highlight is a good idea and I've created an issue for the suggestion [1]. I'll try to get that added in time for the next round.
[1] https://github.com/TechEmpower/FrameworkBenchmarks/issues/35...
Re: Frameworks Round 6
#20For such a young language, I'm really surprised by the performance of Go there. Quite awesome.