Your Facebook button says "Like", but it's a share. There's no liking involved.
Why to use Twitter, Facebook and Google Plus share links and not buttons
11–20 of 65 posts
Re: Why to use Twitter, Facebook and Google Plus share links and not buttons
#12I always find this ironic about these articles don't track your users, or prism is watching, let's use mailvelope, some of these pages that is promoting privacy, integrates google analytics, have a share button, or some type of off server request.
Re: Why to use Twitter, Facebook and Google Plus share links and not buttons
#13I run that on my own website and it works well.
Re: Why to use Twitter, Facebook and Google Plus share links and not buttons
#14Another note: you can create realistic share buttons by fetching the Like counts via JavaScript. I run that on my own website and it works well.
Re: Why to use Twitter, Facebook and Google Plus share links and not buttons
#15Re: Why to use Twitter, Facebook and Google Plus share links and not buttons
#16Re: Why to use Twitter, Facebook and Google Plus share links and not buttons
#17It appears to have an unclear lifespan. While it has been fully replaced by the Feed Dialog, it's still working now and is used all over the internet. I can see the case where it won't see any further development or features, but it's a tough call whether or not to incorporate the deprecated method or accept possible risks of the current methods - Like button or Feed Dialog.
Re: Why to use Twitter, Facebook and Google Plus share links and not buttons
#18Re: Why to use Twitter, Facebook and Google Plus share links and not buttons
#19We've been using the same method for quote some time now. Not just for privacy purposes, but also performance-wise all these scripts and iframes are a bit much. Demo and code at http://simpleshare.schuttelaar.nl/
Re: Why to use Twitter, Facebook and Google Plus share links and not buttons
#20The links to Facebook/Twitter/etc. should best be HTTPS, I think.