"Creative and willing to invest financially". Yes.
Don't Look for Talent, Find People Who Do Things
61–70 of 71 posts
Re: Don't Look for Talent, Find People Who Do Things
#62shameless autopromotion, a.k.a. my viewpoint: http://blog.cyplo.net/2011/07/24/how-to-hire-people/
Re: Don't Look for Talent, Find People Who Do Things
#63Earlier quoted context omitted.
I don't like X, therefore I won't consider X's arguments. That strategy seems like a great way to never learn anything except whatever confirms your own biases.
I didn't say he wasn't right about this. Just regret that I provided traffic to his site.
Re: Don't Look for Talent, Find People Who Do Things
#64Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yes. Both with autism. It is challenging, but not impossible. You have to do more than just a hobby. You have to manage time, energy, and money.
Wow. Our younger is only slightly autistic, and the elder has already grown up. Two simultaneously would be challenging indeed!
Re: Don't Look for Talent, Find People Who Do Things
#65I can't work on projects outside of work because I work ~12 hours a day, 6-7 days a week and there's no way I can free up the long periods of time needed to create something good. I can't talk up my technical accomplishments in an interview because my job isn't particularly technically demanding or interesting, beyond the company name. I think I'm a good interviewer except when it comes to talking about anything I've…
Wait, you're working 60+ hours on boring crap that doesn't advance your career? WHAT THE HELL?!? STOP THAT!! Take another job. ANY other job. Flip burgers if you must. Get your priorities in order. 60+ hour work weeks on something you don't utterly love leave you no time to have a life, much less build a career.
Re: Don't Look for Talent, Find People Who Do Things
#66I find this particularly tingling because Tucker himself is a perfect example of doing things. He gets a lot of flak from people calling him a poor writer and lambasting him for writing about some of the "finer" topics in life. Yet, he is a New York Times bestselling author, and his detractors are not.
He's the worst kind of shitty writer. He's clearly intelligent. His writing is shit because he doesn't care. Why should I spend time reading him if he doesn't put time into the quality of his writing?
I am not convinced this is true, nor have I seen a sophisticated analysis of his work that demonstrates this point (though I am open to reading one); it seems that most people assume the point and then proceed from there.
I did write a mostly positive analysis of his work here: http://jseliger.wordpress.com/2012/02/09/hilarity-ensues-tuc... , however.
Re: Don't Look for Talent, Find People Who Do Things
#67I read this whole post before realizing it was written by that prick, Tucker Max. I wish I could unread it.
Re: Don't Look for Talent, Find People Who Do Things
#68Earlier quoted context omitted.
Wait, you're working 60+ hours on boring crap that doesn't advance your career? WHAT THE HELL?!? STOP THAT!! Take another job. ANY other job. Flip burgers if you must. Get your priorities in order. 60+ hour work weeks on something you don't utterly love leave you no time to have a life, much less build a career.
And sometimes you desperately need money.
Re: Don't Look for Talent, Find People Who Do Things
#69shameless autopromotion, a.k.a. my viewpoint: http://blog.cyplo.net/2011/07/24/how-to-hire-people/
Pro-tip: don't just link your blog post, give us an executive summary. If you won't make the effort to do at least that, I wouldn't expect many to make the effort to click your link.
Re: Don't Look for Talent, Find People Who Do Things
#70Earlier quoted context omitted.
Pro-tip: don't just link your blog post, give us an executive summary. If you won't make the effort to do at least that, I wouldn't expect many to make the effort to click your link.
thanks :) to you point: I think the recruitment process should be less automated and more humane. One should just sit and try to work with another person, as they would be their work partner.