Live data from Hacker News

TokuMX 1.0: MongoDB with transactions, compression, MVCC, clustering indexes

tokutek.com

31–35 of 35 posts

Re: TokuMX 1.0: MongoDB with transactions, compression, MVCC, clustering indexes

#31

I've been on the fence about trying this on Instrumental; we've been looking at moving to DynamoDB, but I wanted to at least see if it would give drop-in magic performance benefits, so I spun off a new SQS queue of our incoming data this evening and did a write throughput test. These are only initial impressions, but: * It's definitely faster. Our write behavior is largely upserts against integers and doubles, and I'…

Disclosure: Rackspace owns ObjectRocket and I work at Rackspace.

Have you tried ObjectRocket (if you're in US-East or US-West)? http://objectrocket.com/ High performance Mongo with replica sets.

Re: TokuMX 1.0: MongoDB with transactions, compression, MVCC, clustering indexes

#33
post #12
post #8

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Is there a feature roadmap somewhere detailing what order these and other features will be added (actual schedule is great too!)?

We're working on that, and we are hoping to base it on feedback, so if there's something you want, definitely let us know.

+1 on a roadmap. Excited to try this out!

Re: TokuMX 1.0: MongoDB with transactions, compression, MVCC, clustering indexes

#34
post #22

Do you think this would ever get merged in to the official release? Are / how are you intending on commercializing it - MongoDB is AGPL?

There have been very informal talks with the folks at 10gen. The topic of getting merged or not will ultimately come down to what users want. Commercialization will start with support, much like what 10gen does for regular MongoDB and what we do for TokuDB.

As for licensing, TokuMX embraces the spirit of open-source and we're confident our open-source licence plays well with the AGPL.

Re: TokuMX 1.0: MongoDB with transactions, compression, MVCC, clustering indexes

#35

I've been on the fence about trying this on Instrumental; we've been looking at moving to DynamoDB, but I wanted to at least see if it would give drop-in magic performance benefits, so I spun off a new SQS queue of our incoming data this evening and did a write throughput test. These are only initial impressions, but: * It's definitely faster. Our write behavior is largely upserts against integers and doubles, and I'…

Disclosure: Rackspace owns ObjectRocket and I work at Rackspace. Have you tried ObjectRocket (if you're in US-East or US-West)? http://objectrocket.com/ High performance Mongo with replica sets.

I've definitely taken a look at Object Rocket, and it's a really nice looking service. However, our dataset size would take us right into your custom quote plan, and based on the rate of increase between the different plans, we'd paying significantly more w/ ObjectRocket than we would w/ DynamoDB (if we do indeed move to DynamoDB).
Post reply on HN