Earlier quoted context omitted.
For all the hand-wringing, the current federal student loan system (under Obama's PAY-E program) has pretty sensible repayment terms. You pay a maximum of 10% of your earnings above 150% of the household poverty level (but no more than you would under an ordinary 10 year repayment plan), capitalized interest capped (over the lifetime of the loan) at 10% of the original principal, balance forgiven after 20 years. It's…
Good info. The problem I see with a cap is that it's one size fits all. I'd rather see a system where a school can charge higher rates if it is confident that its graduates will be able to repay those loans. 20 years just seems too long. And the key point here is that when a balance is forgiven, the institution should bear the cost, not the government. Maybe that's already the case. Can you provide more detail?
That assumes they really feel it. If a school charges you $500,000 per year for tuition and then gives you financial aid of $480,000 per year, they aren't really giving you that money.
If a school extends you $150,000 in credit, and then in 20 years you've only paid $40,000 of it back, they haven't really lost $110,000. They are just practicing perfect price discrimination, getting the most money from the people most willing to pay, backed up by the government who is doing the work of auditing people's tax records to ensure compliance.