The idea of real time communication is similar to IRC, but remember that it's just a protocol. The big difference here is what you can do with how that data is presented to users. There are some really neat things you can do with HTTP and a browser that IRC clients lack. The whole rendering a page with text, images, and markup together adds a lot to the experience that you just don't get with IRC. Great job friendfee…
The Man Who Made Gmail Says Real-Time Conversation is What's Next
11–20 of 36 posts
Re: The Man Who Made Gmail Says Real-Time Conversation is What's Next
#12> flowing, multi-person, real-time conversations. In other words, IRC? Every "next big thing" communication medium has been trying to replicate the IRC experience for the past 15 years. Twitter is the closest, it even has # and @ modifiers - I mean come on, this is getting pretty ridiculous. A stand-alone twitter client that shows a message from everyone that is posting to #topic and @messages directed to you? Last t…
Re: The Man Who Made Gmail Says Real-Time Conversation is What's Next
#13> flowing, multi-person, real-time conversations. In other words, IRC? Every "next big thing" communication medium has been trying to replicate the IRC experience for the past 15 years. Twitter is the closest, it even has # and @ modifiers - I mean come on, this is getting pretty ridiculous. A stand-alone twitter client that shows a message from everyone that is posting to #topic and @messages directed to you? Last t…
Have you used Friendfeed? It is what Twitter should be and it has the benefits of IRC with an order of magnitude more practicality. Unfortunately I almost never use Friendfeed; all of my friends are on Facebook.
Re: The Man Who Made Gmail Says Real-Time Conversation is What's Next
#14It's hard to track and organize real-time conversations.. they start off in one place and end up in another. And then even if that's fine, it's impossible to then categorize the results in any meaningful way that makes it easy for others not a part of the original discussion to go back and view the details of the (large) conversation.
The nature of emails and other "turn-based communication systems" makes people tend to make each individual "element" of the thread a standalone entity. A single has way better odds of making sense on its own than a single IRC message...
Re: The Man Who Made Gmail Says Real-Time Conversation is What's Next
#15The difference between IRC and everything else is the organization of it all. It's hard to track and organize real-time conversations.. they start off in one place and end up in another. And then even if that's fine, it's impossible to then categorize the results in any meaningful way that makes it easy for others not a part of the original discussion to go back and view the details of the (large) conversation. The n…
Re: The Man Who Made Gmail Says Real-Time Conversation is What's Next
#16> flowing, multi-person, real-time conversations. In other words, IRC? Every "next big thing" communication medium has been trying to replicate the IRC experience for the past 15 years. Twitter is the closest, it even has # and @ modifiers - I mean come on, this is getting pretty ridiculous. A stand-alone twitter client that shows a message from everyone that is posting to #topic and @messages directed to you? Last t…
And blogging is basically just a .plan file...
Re: The Man Who Made Gmail Says Real-Time Conversation is What's Next
#17So when will Google officially make this their social network?
Re: The Man Who Made Gmail Says Real-Time Conversation is What's Next
#18So when will Google officially make this their social network?
Re: The Man Who Made Gmail Says Real-Time Conversation is What's Next
#19Earlier quoted context omitted.
And blogging is basically just a .plan file...
Come on Paul. IM is hardly ancient geek history.
Re: The Man Who Made Gmail Says Real-Time Conversation is What's Next
#20Earlier quoted context omitted.
And blogging is basically just a .plan file...
Come on Paul. IM is hardly ancient geek history.