Earlier quoted context omitted.
In a world where the US government is scanning all your electronic communications, and (we'll next discover) searching your OS X- and Windows-based computers at will, how do you, as a practical matter, keep your private key "private"?
Only use your private key with Tinfoil Hat Linux on an offline air-gapped computer: http://tinfoilhat.shmoo.com/ I recommend disconnecting your monitor and only receiving output by having it blinked out at you through your capslock light on your keyboard. Bonus points if you can get your hands on some TEMPEST hardened hardware, and/or tamper-resistant hardware. Anything less will leave you vulnerable to the black hel…
An encrypted message to Edward Snowden
61–70 of 164 posts
Re: An encrypted message to Edward Snowden
#62If Edward Snowden does have a pgp key (I can't find one online), it hasn't been revealed in this message. It looks like the signing and encryption keys are the same: gpg: armor: BEGIN PGP MESSAGE gpg: armor header: Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.19 (Darwin) gpg: armor header: Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org :pubkey enc packet: version 3, algo 1, keyid 5B50940B79DEBE35 data: [4096 bits] gpg: public key is 79DEBE3…
There's no way to tell when a key was uploaded to a keyserver without the keyserver's logs.
Oh wait. That plan only works for federal agencies and secret courts. Never mind.
Re: An encrypted message to Edward Snowden
#63Earlier quoted context omitted.
I would be very interested in a a tutorial or guide for getting something like this set up on OS X.
OS X has smart card support for FileVault 1 but not FileVault 2. It only includes enough drivers to support US DoD CAC cards, and other NATO countries that have standardized on our stuff.
http://shop.kernelconcepts.de/index.php?cPath=1_26&sort=2a&l...
Re: An encrypted message to Edward Snowden
#64Verax was the name used by Snowden to communicate with Laura Poitras (and perhaps others as well), but the story didn't break until June 5 and his identity wasn't revealed until days later.
So why is Wired encrypting a message with a key using that name that was generated before the name was publicly known in association with Snowden?
EDIT: Disregard the above—the "encrypted with" key is the recipient's key, not the sender/signer. 79DEBE35 may well be Snowden's key (but that's not proven either).
Re: An encrypted message to Edward Snowden
#65The target key was published on 5/20. # gpg --list-packets /tmp/snowden.asc :pubkey enc packet: version 3, algo 1, keyid 5B50940B79DEBE35 data: [4096 bits] :encrypted data packet: length: unknown mdc_method: 2 gpg: encrypted with 4096-bit RSA key, ID 79DEBE35, created 2013-05-20 "Verax (Informed Democracy Front)" (79DEBE35 can be found on the subkeys.pgp.net keyserver)
Re: An encrypted message to Edward Snowden
#66Snowden, just remember that Kevin Poulsen and Adrian Lamo helped the US Government in catching Bradley Manning. EDIT: Also, a pretty safe way to carry an interview would be VPN + Tor + Bitmessage. EDIT2: Users sneak and tlb claim Tor isn't safe because of timing attacks. Read below.
> isn't safe because of timing attacks What about that it isn't safe because of who is running many of the exit nodes?
This is a pretty interesting "where do I start?" paper if you want to know more but don't have much background on the subject:
Re: An encrypted message to Edward Snowden
#67I don't get it, unless Snowden's published his public key somewhere and Wired has some really, really important information for him?
The reason you would advertise a page like this is to get lots of people to visit it. It gives Snowden the ability to look like any of the other (tens?) of thousands of people who visit the URL in the next little while.
Re: An encrypted message to Edward Snowden
#68Earlier quoted context omitted.
yeah, I was wondering about how strong GPG was. Back in the day, i.e. the 90's, the assumption was it would take years for then-current NSA supercomputers to factor the keys. Nowadays, with all sorts of new attacks, analyses, and cheap as hell compute time, I would wager that time requirement has gone significantly down.
AFAIK, the current publicly-known record for breaking RSA keys is the factorization of RSA-768 in 2010: http://eprint.iacr.org/2010/006.pdf That paper says it took about 1500 CPU-years to break a 768-bit key, and that the difficulty increases 1000x for each additional 256 bits of key length. For a back-of-the-envelope cost estimate, I'm going to assume that there have been no major theoretical breakthroughs in the la…
Re: An encrypted message to Edward Snowden
#69Earlier quoted context omitted.
The light reflected off your eyes from the capslock key is readable from high-res cameras. It's better to have leads hooked up to one of your toes and to toggle a 24V source so you can interpret the pulses in morse code. Edit: obviously the 24V must come from a battery which is charged only at specific intervals -- otherwise they can interpret your messages by watching mains voltage variation.
obviously! It's times like these, I'm grateful for limited terms of office, and a politically divided country.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2013/jun/14/nsa-part...
Re: An encrypted message to Edward Snowden
#70Earlier quoted context omitted.
Only use your private key with Tinfoil Hat Linux on an offline air-gapped computer: http://tinfoilhat.shmoo.com/ I recommend disconnecting your monitor and only receiving output by having it blinked out at you through your capslock light on your keyboard. Bonus points if you can get your hands on some TEMPEST hardened hardware, and/or tamper-resistant hardware. Anything less will leave you vulnerable to the black hel…
Well, if you can do that (program a computer via a blinking keyboard LED in Morse code to avoid Van Eck phreaking,) you're well on your way to discovering the lost Nazi gold in the Philippines.