Earlier quoted context omitted.
Funny. This is the one to which I had the most negative response. Zipcodes are terrible for inferring anything geographically interesting. A single zipcode is just a collection of USPS postal routes; nothing more, nothing less. They don't have to be contained within a single city, or even a single state, nor do they have to be contiguous, and they can overlap with one another. New ones are also added all the time, an…
ZIPs are almost always fine at a state granularity, and pretty good for cities. If the form is street/city/state/zip, you can autofill State correctly from ZIP 99.9% of the time.
Website mistakes that are easily fixed
21–30 of 70 posts
Re: Website mistakes that are easily fixed
#22Asking for city, state and zip code is my favorite on the list. Plus the country should be asked for first then if US only get the street and zip code. There was a link on HN sometime ago that showed that people trusted the form/page more when complete address information was requested (I believe the conclusion was that people were used to doing it that way) so maybe there is a downside to the shorter version.
Re: Website mistakes that are easily fixed
#23You also have the case of foreign users on public computers who may be unable to fiddle with the language settings.
Re: Website mistakes that are easily fixed
#24Earlier quoted context omitted.
ZIPs are almost always fine at a state granularity, and pretty good for cities. If the form is street/city/state/zip, you can autofill State correctly from ZIP 99.9% of the time.
Do you have data supporting the 99.9%? I suspect that's high; there are buildings within five blocks of where I'm sitting that have a zipcode that crosses a state line, and I don't think it's the only state-crossing zip in my area (Washington, DC, for what it's worth). In any event, even if it's accurate, it doesn't take that much traffic for a .1% error rate to start to add up to non-trivial number of users, especia…
But think about it, if you're taking an address to ship something, getting the ZIP right is what matters. If your package has 45201 on it, it doesn't matter if it says Cincinnati, OH or Cincinnati, KY.
[0] http://web.archive.org/web/20110112211559/http://maps.huge.i...
Re: Website mistakes that are easily fixed
#25Re: Website mistakes that are easily fixed
#26Earlier quoted context omitted.
Do you have data supporting the 99.9%? I suspect that's high; there are buildings within five blocks of where I'm sitting that have a zipcode that crosses a state line, and I don't think it's the only state-crossing zip in my area (Washington, DC, for what it's worth). In any event, even if it's accurate, it doesn't take that much traffic for a .1% error rate to start to add up to non-trivial number of users, especia…
Well, this list shows 293 ZIPs that cross state lines [0], this FAQ says there are ~43,000 ZIPs in use [1] so that puts it closer to 99.3%. But think about it, if you're taking an address to ship something, getting the ZIP right is what matters. If your package has 45201 on it, it doesn't matter if it says Cincinnati, OH or Cincinnati, KY. [0] http://web.archive.org/web/20110112211559/http://maps.huge.i... [1] http:/…
Re: Website mistakes that are easily fixed
#27Asking for city, state and zip code is my favorite on the list. Plus the country should be asked for first then if US only get the street and zip code. There was a link on HN sometime ago that showed that people trusted the form/page more when complete address information was requested (I believe the conclusion was that people were used to doing it that way) so maybe there is a downside to the shorter version.
Funny. This is the one to which I had the most negative response. Zipcodes are terrible for inferring anything geographically interesting. A single zipcode is just a collection of USPS postal routes; nothing more, nothing less. They don't have to be contained within a single city, or even a single state, nor do they have to be contiguous, and they can overlap with one another. New ones are also added all the time, an…
Re: Website mistakes that are easily fixed
#28
when it should be
so I can't middle click it or Ctrl-click it to open in a new tab. Even worse if there's (2) href="#"
added, which upon middle click will happily load the page I'm currently on inside the new tab.I have an extension in Firefox which changes the mouse cursor for (1) from pointer (hand), so I can easily distinguish that case, I hope this became a W3C standard somehow (though the standard way for executing JS are buttons, not anchors, so probably it won't ever become standardized).
Re: Website mistakes that are easily fixed
#29Regarding the title of his article, as a someone who routinely uses TCP/IP for tasks other than transmitting HTML, I find his concept of "internet" to be rather myopic.