1–7 of 7 posts
One further, is an initiative like PRISM actually an act of domestic terrorism?
One more, wouldn't the logical response to a terrorist attack be granting of more freedom and liberty to the American people (to signify they can't break our stride)?
So, yes to more freedom, and please refuse to be terrorized https://www.schneier.com/essay-124.html . Freedom is the absence of coercion, and that is all the security I care to have. The chance of being murdered by a politically motivated hot-head is so low that it doesn't even register on my list of concerns.
Too bad the statement above confuses me! That's the exact reason why they commit domestic terrorism... ahh the irony!
It will make for a good story in the future called "The Fall of Advance Humans". It shall be a mere legend as near primitive people will wonder, how this advanced world could destroy itself.
Then 1000 years later, history would have been repeated, and there will be a legend called "The Fall of the Advanced Humans, That Once Wondered How an Advanced World could destroy itself... They found the answer"... etc.
sorry for the rambling. I like your post though I agree 100% that PRISM is an act of terrorism on our freedoms.
“They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.” ― Benjamin Franklin
"You heretic of the great states of America, you doubt our leaders? The very men that lead our children through education, a no child left behind policy. Or the war to protect our freedom from Iraq an Afghanistan how can these men terrorize America, and to say they surrender to Al-Qada, how dare you!" - A likely response from about 70% of America(a guess based off no statistics) Too bad the statement above confuses m…
There are nearly 40,000 drunk driving deaths per year. If we are willing to give up privacy for security, why aren't there DUI checks on every onramp? Drunk driving kills more people than terrorism by orders of magnitude.