Live data from Hacker News

President Obama’s Dragnet

nytimes.com

11–20 of 141 posts

Re: President Obama’s Dragnet

#11
post #8

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What's the significance of this?

> What's the significance of this? I cannot remember (I'm 49yo) the NYT ever going from endorsing a candidate [1] to " The administration has now lost all credibility. " That's quite a fall politically. [1] http://www.nytimes.com/2012/10/28/opinion/sunday/barack-obam... Edit: I have to agree with them, but I hold out hope that this will cause several high-profile firings in the administration.

> I hold out hope that this will cause several high-profile firings in the administration.

Why would it? It's pretty obvious Obama's complicit in this - why would he fire those who are implementing policies that he's supporting?

Re: President Obama’s Dragnet

#12
post #8

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> What's the significance of this? I cannot remember (I'm 49yo) the NYT ever going from endorsing a candidate [1] to " The administration has now lost all credibility. " That's quite a fall politically. [1] http://www.nytimes.com/2012/10/28/opinion/sunday/barack-obam... Edit: I have to agree with them, but I hold out hope that this will cause several high-profile firings in the administration.

> I hold out hope that this will cause several high-profile firings in the administration. Why would it? It's pretty obvious Obama's complicit in this - why would he fire those who are implementing policies that he's supporting?

In politics, you fire those below you to save yourself. Even if they did right by you.

Re: President Obama’s Dragnet

#14
post #8

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> What's the significance of this? I cannot remember (I'm 49yo) the NYT ever going from endorsing a candidate [1] to " The administration has now lost all credibility. " That's quite a fall politically. [1] http://www.nytimes.com/2012/10/28/opinion/sunday/barack-obam... Edit: I have to agree with them, but I hold out hope that this will cause several high-profile firings in the administration.

> I hold out hope that this will cause several high-profile firings in the administration. Why would it? It's pretty obvious Obama's complicit in this - why would he fire those who are implementing policies that he's supporting?

When presented with new data, some people change course. I am hoping Obama falls into that class.

Re: President Obama’s Dragnet

#15
post #8

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> What's the significance of this? I cannot remember (I'm 49yo) the NYT ever going from endorsing a candidate [1] to " The administration has now lost all credibility. " That's quite a fall politically. [1] http://www.nytimes.com/2012/10/28/opinion/sunday/barack-obam... Edit: I have to agree with them, but I hold out hope that this will cause several high-profile firings in the administration.

> I hold out hope that this will cause several high-profile firings in the administration. Why would it? It's pretty obvious Obama's complicit in this - why would he fire those who are implementing policies that he's supporting?

Rule number one of plumbing: Shit flows downhill.

Re: President Obama’s Dragnet

#17

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> I hold out hope that this will cause several high-profile firings in the administration. Why would it? It's pretty obvious Obama's complicit in this - why would he fire those who are implementing policies that he's supporting?

When presented with new data, some people change course. I am hoping Obama falls into that class.

New data? Do you really think this is news to Obama?

Re: President Obama’s Dragnet

#19
post #16

Keep paying US taxes and voting. That should work. (But seriously. It's time. Pack your belongings and leave. Vote with your tax dollars, please.)

Leave where? Everyone always says that, but where would be better (mainly in terms of civil liberties)?

Re: President Obama’s Dragnet

#20
post #16

Keep paying US taxes and voting. That should work. (But seriously. It's time. Pack your belongings and leave. Vote with your tax dollars, please.)

Leave where? Everyone always says that, but where would be better (mainly in terms of civil liberties)?

Yeah, leaving doesn't work. The solution is sadly not that simple.

But neither does voting. How could voting work when the public is not even suppose to be aware of this sort of thing? This sort of secrecy is incompatible with democracy. Without being able to make an informed decision the best you can do is vote for the candidate that assures you that they will have a transparent administration.... oh wait.

Post reply on HN