Live data from Hacker News

Snapchat, You've Made a Huge Mistake

blog.etanzapinsky.com

91–100 of 129 posts

Re: Snapchat, You've Made a Huge Mistake

#91
I'm now getting 404 errors for the web profiles:

http://www.snapchat.com/username

...but I was building a crawler for fun and have been making tons of requests - the other pages seem to be working just fine. Anyone else having trouble? Did Snapchat do the right thing and shut down user profiles?

Re: Snapchat, You've Made a Huge Mistake

#92
post #84
post #35

I find Snapchat's charter fascinating. I say this as the author of a competing, and much less successful, product called Privy ( https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.appidio.pr... ). I wrote Privy with a very simple use case in mind. It was for sending messages that you never want to resurface. Privacy, of course, was paramount. After reading a few interviews with the Snapchat guys, I was amused that the…

`unlike snap chat there is no account setup required` So do you authenticate with IMEI or phone number?

There is no authentication. Message is uploaded to server and then the sender's phone sends an SMS message with a query string authenticated URL to the recipient.

That way the system never knows the sender's identity or to whom the message was sent.

Re: Snapchat, You've Made a Huge Mistake

#94
post #35

I find Snapchat's charter fascinating. I say this as the author of a competing, and much less successful, product called Privy ( https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.appidio.pr... ). I wrote Privy with a very simple use case in mind. It was for sending messages that you never want to resurface. Privacy, of course, was paramount. After reading a few interviews with the Snapchat guys, I was amused that the…

You can't build a system that only lets a user view something in the way you claim on untrusted hardware, such as a cell phone: it is an hour of work and a few lines of code to entirely defeat your security. Snapchat really could not claim they can provide that, as they can't. While Snapchat somewhat relies on some confusion regarding this, their description is at least honest that this is an impossible problem, and their wording is largely based on the idea that they can't even keep the user from performing a very simple screenshot.

Re: Snapchat, You've Made a Huge Mistake

#95
I don't personally mind people seeing information like this about me, but I can see why it's a bit of an invasion. I just learned who gets the most snapchats from who on my friends list. I think a lot of people will either love or hate this.

Love this because they're exempt from the downsides and they have juicy details on their friends.

Hate this because their own details are now public.

Re: Snapchat, You've Made a Huge Mistake

#96
post #34
post #25

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The comment about email isn't really logical. Crow bars help you kill people but that doesn't mean we should treat them the same way as guns. I'm sure there is a technical term for it (logical fallacy) but that's besides my point and I'm on mobile :). This is exactly my point.

If the majority of SnapChat users are using it to have extra-marital affairs, there may be something to it. SnapChat wasn't created because we as a society were lacking in communication tools.

Alright, I'll go there: What is wrong with developing an app that is used for extra-marital affairs, even if that is its explicit purpose?

For the sake of argument, lets just say that extra-marital affairs being immoral is axiomatic (I don't agree, but that is not going to be a productive discussion). The two people who made vows are the ones with the moral obligation, not the rest of society. Every individual third party is not part of that arrangement, and who are they to second guess somebody who is in that agreement? Both are consenting adults, there is no justification for us telling them what to do. If they want to promise each other something, and then go back on that promise, that is entirely between them.

Re: Snapchat, You've Made a Huge Mistake

#97

I'm now getting 404 errors for the web profiles: http://www.snapchat.com/username ...but I was building a crawler for fun and have been making tons of requests - the other pages seem to be working just fine. Anyone else having trouble? Did Snapchat do the right thing and shut down user profiles?

It appears they did!

Re: Snapchat, You've Made a Huge Mistake

#98
post #78
post #37

Earlier quoted context omitted.

"I think we all agree that Twitter plays an important role in society today" Uh, how does Twitter play an important role in society?

Subjective, I guess. But many movements in countries with oppressive regimes use Twitter heavily to spread information.

That's very nice, but also very localized.

In most other countries I'd value Twitter's contribution to society about as much as McDonalds commercials...

Re: Snapchat, You've Made a Huge Mistake

#99
post #79

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What if people discover you have made lots of calls to KKK? They will quickly jump to conclusion that you are probably a neo-nazi, but maybe you was like that black guy that made a KKK documentary The thing is, Verizon isn't handing over identities. This isn't to absolve Verizon here at all, but to illustrate that the US Government can't find terrorists this way.

Interesting argument, but don't you think the NSA/FBI are just just going to say "we're not collecting/analyzing enough data"?

Sure, but politicians are saying that it's necessary to find terrorists, but this warrant doesn't help that happen. Unless, of course, they correlate it with other data they have, which was perhaps collected warrantlessly and therefore possibly inadmissable in court. After all, Bush engaged in illegal wiretapping for 5 years before the 7 years since Section 215 took effect. I doubt they've thrown that data away.

Re: Snapchat, You've Made a Huge Mistake

#100
If you login to Facebook, go to the search bar and type in the letter A, you will see a list of your friends whose name (first/middle/last) starts with an A, but it's sorted based on who you are most likely to be looking for. I don't know exactly how they determime this since it could be based on so many factors like messaging, profile viewing, searching, photo tagging, shared events... even pokes!

It's spooky accurate and yet Facebook goes out of their way to never mention this kind of thing: they don't want us to realize how well they know us!

Post reply on HN