Live data from Hacker News

Send payouts with Stripe

stripe.com

81–90 of 143 posts

Re: Send payouts with Stripe

#81
post #12

Apart from Balanced Payments and Dwolla I don't think anyone gives a simple way (means using API) to send payouts. This could be huge!

FWIW, I think Dwolla still requires the recipient to have a Dwolla account. Stripe and Balanced are white labeled products.

Re: Send payouts with Stripe

#82
post #45

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Stripe actually requires substantially less information -- just the recipient's name. Still, this isn't about Stripe vs Balanced -- we just built the API many of our users wanted. Hope you guys continue to do well!

Its nice to see that Stripe wishes competitors well when all Balanced tried to do was promote their brand.

This statement fully captures the stark difference between Stripe and Balanced. Stripe is led by engineers who want to improve the payments infrastructure. Balanced is led by businesspeople who want to hit it big. Stripe just so happens to be a business as well. Nothing wrong with either, but that should point you toward which company has the developer's true interests at heart :)

Hint: It's Stripe.

Re: Send payouts with Stripe

#83
post #76

I'm most interested in the inverse... allowing customers to send us cash directly from their bank accounts for $.25 per transfer (instead of the bullshit credit card company fees). I'm sure there's some serious fraud implications that Stripe would have to deal with to ensure validity, but is that coming?

FWIW, Balanced has this functionality: https://www.balancedpayments.com/docs/api?language=bash#crea...

Re: Send payouts with Stripe

#84
post #62
post #43

(I work at Balanced) Balanced ( https://balancedpayments.com ) provides a payouts solution for marketplaces like redditgifts, Crowdtilt, Fancy, Artsy, Visual.ly, and many others. The differences with Stripe include the money being available for payout immediately (instead of 5 days), and the recipient will receive the money the next business day. Balanced has also performed a lot of work to verify merchants with as l…

As with all money transfer products, the technology to transfer funds to an individual is generally the fun/easy part. Wait until you find out about America's (and most other countries) wonderful anti-money laundering and anti-terrorist financing compliance laws that can land you in less-fun places like federal prison if you don't use this sort of webservice very, very carefully.

Former licensed money transmitter executive here. As far as I am aware, as long as you are not "structuring" transfers (which means breaking payments up with the intent to hide their common origin and/or destination) and are not attempting to actually launder money, the real risk of federal prison time is born by the operator of an unlicensed money transmitter, not the user of such a service.

In the US, operating an unlicensed money transmitter is an offense that carries, if I recall properly, up to five years of federal prison time per count[1]. That is to say, if you create a service by which one party is able to send money to another third party, and operate that service without a license where one is required (and under that license adhere to capital, bonding and procedural compliance requirements), you are subject to federal criminal prosecution.

I'd be curious as to Stripe's and Balanced's interpretation of their obligations under these laws vis-a-vis their payout services.

[1] http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1960

Re: Send payouts with Stripe

#85

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Its nice to see that Stripe wishes competitors well when all Balanced tried to do was promote their brand.

This statement fully captures the stark difference between Stripe and Balanced. Stripe is led by engineers who want to improve the payments infrastructure. Balanced is led by businesspeople who want to hit it big. Stripe just so happens to be a business as well. Nothing wrong with either, but that should point you toward which company has the developer's true interests at heart :) Hint: It's Stripe.

Bias alert: I have a Stripe account, but not a Balanced account.

I think it's disingenuous to not suggest that Balanced doesn't 'have the developer's true interests at heart.' They've been really pushing the hypermedia API stuff, which is technologically exciting, as well as doing the whole 'open company' thing, which is taking the concept open source to interesting places.

Re: Send payouts with Stripe

#86
post #55

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Interesting to see Balanced and Stripe competing. Is this going to be a growing trend in YC? I'm sure it's a hard problem to avoid.

Balanced has always inhabited a nebulous void of blatant-copying-with-one-novel-new-feature territory for me. It's clear they just copied (with permission? consent?) the public interface of Stripe. They tried to copy the documentation format (layout, style, presentation) too, but it came off kinda poorly (margins, people. margins). They have public test cards/accounts, but they fail to test correctly because they get…

Balanced has a ridiculously huge advantage in the next-day payouts (same-day to WF bank accounts!), like Square offers. However, Stripe is far better supported by third-party clients for shopping carts.

It's really unfortunate that we have a fractured payment processing market where overlapping them doesn't solve the problem. For example:

Square: Best in-person payment processor. Next day payments if taken before 5 PM PST. Does card-not-present transactions as well. For some insane reason, does not have web access or an API despite being around longer than Stripe and Balanced.

Stripe: Best integration with wp-commerce, third party plugins, etc. Excellent interface. Rapid prototyping and feature rollout. Cons: 7 day rolling payments are slower than Square, Balanced, and Paypal.

Balanced: Fastest payments. Terrible third-party support. Documentation not nearly as good as Stripe, interface is slightly confusing.

I use Stripe for my ecommerce business and Square for in-person transactions, but I desperately want to switch to Balanced because of cashflow improvements. But that's not going to happen until third-party plugin support is vastly improved (I've already opened tickets on this months ago in their tracker with no response). Or I'd switch to Square if they decided they wanted an additional $XXX million dollars in business and offered a web API (what is the reason for NOT having this).

Annoying, but considering where we were just a few years ago, I'll take it.

Re: Send payouts with Stripe

#87
post #40
post #31

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I originally thought the same too, but found that it is in Beta. http://blog.balancedpayments.com/balanced-payment-method-pay...

The Balanced Payouts service has been available for some time. Our ACH Debit (pay with bank account) is in Beta however.

whoa...1% + $.30 for bank payments??? why would you need a percentage on an ACH transfer when most others charge a flat rate?

Re: Send payouts with Stripe

#88

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Its nice to see that Stripe wishes competitors well when all Balanced tried to do was promote their brand.

This statement fully captures the stark difference between Stripe and Balanced. Stripe is led by engineers who want to improve the payments infrastructure. Balanced is led by businesspeople who want to hit it big. Stripe just so happens to be a business as well. Nothing wrong with either, but that should point you toward which company has the developer's true interests at heart :) Hint: It's Stripe.

I don't know anyone who works at either company so maybe one of them is full of nasty people who hate their customers and one is full of lovely people who don't care about making profit - but that's very unlikely. Much more likely is that they both want to maximise their profits, they both understand that offering a good service to their customers is the way to do this, and both approach this in different ways. And frankly the fact that a Stripe employee said a nice thing about them as opposed to "fuck them use Stripe" doesn't give any clue on the subject, it just says this person is a.) polite and b.) not an idiot.

Re: Send payouts with Stripe

#89
post #55

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Balanced has always inhabited a nebulous void of blatant-copying-with-one-novel-new-feature territory for me. It's clear they just copied (with permission? consent?) the public interface of Stripe. They tried to copy the documentation format (layout, style, presentation) too, but it came off kinda poorly (margins, people. margins). They have public test cards/accounts, but they fail to test correctly because they get…

Balanced has a ridiculously huge advantage in the next-day payouts (same-day to WF bank accounts!), like Square offers. However, Stripe is far better supported by third-party clients for shopping carts. It's really unfortunate that we have a fractured payment processing market where overlapping them doesn't solve the problem. For example: Square: Best in-person payment processor. Next day payments if taken before 5 P…

If our current payouts schedule isn't working for you, we'd be happy to help out. Feel free to ping me at amber@stripe.com.
Post reply on HN