Live data from Hacker News

IBM to Acquire SoftLayer

www-03.ibm.com

61–70 of 113 posts

Re: IBM to Acquire SoftLayer

#61
Nobody else here seeing the obvious reason?

Let me take you back a few years. Remember the SCO lawsuit? Their attempts to sell licenses? Well, only one company bought one -- EV1. Who are now part of SoftLayer (via ThePlanet). Clearly IBM is just after said license. :-)

Re: IBM to Acquire SoftLayer

#62
post #19

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I've used SL in the past and have had business associates use them as well. I experienced nothing but problems, and regularly hear complaints from those who still use it. This may just be a case of IBM needing to acquire companies to add revenue to their financial statements.

That's strange. They're the #1 dedicated hosting provider used by YC-funded startups. They have a reputation as the best facilities, best private network, best control panel and best support staff you can get with rented hardware. They've swapped failed hardware for me in under an hour at 3AM their time, recovered data from a corrupt disk for me at no charge, their reliability and network is generally excellent... wh…

I agree, SoftLayer seems to provide great performance for us at HealthPost.

Re: IBM to Acquire SoftLayer

#63

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The Dallas startup scene is exploding right now, especially for B2B companies. Geographic convenience to both coasts, low taxes, low living costs, high concentration of Fortune 500s and a lot of good talent itching to leave their cubicles. http://launchdfw.com/

How about the weather? I hear it is really hot in summer. Is it comparable to Pheonix?

I believe it was last year that we had 100 days straight of 100+ degree weather. It's a beating... Pretty much Juneish - October are unbearable. The rest of the year is lovely.

Re: IBM to Acquire SoftLayer

#64
post #5

Worth observing that for all the excitement about the recent crop of billion-dollar Silicon Valley startups, SoftLayer is based in Dallas, TX (and founded only in 2005). I suspect, and this will be easy enough to prove one way or the other after a few years so feel free to call me on it, that we'll see a disproportionate number of successful exits come from /outside/ the valley. My gut tells me that high-cost of livi…

There is one major problem to starting what are to become big tech companies outside of the Bay Area: labor supply. Very few places in the world can feed the labor needs of a fast growing tech company. Even the largest companies in the Bay Area have to go to New York, LA, and elsewhere to hire more people. What that means is that you are welcome to start a company wherever you like, but when it comes time to hire a l…

It's a bigger deal for VC backed companies that need to grow faster.

I know of a few small, profitable companies that acquire talent by luring them away from major metro areas. Also, lots of big companies are attracting talent from people who are not in an urban cluster like SF, NYC, etc. IBM is a great example of that.

Re: IBM to Acquire SoftLayer

#65

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Normally I would agree. But with regards to Dallas, we are a large corporation (and usually energy-focused) first town. The Dallas Morning News, our largest rag here locally, isn't even covering this acquisition: http://www.dallasnews.com/business/ Hard to unseat or even compete with SV if you can't even get local attention or coverage for a big tech/startup win.

DFW has much more than energy. Corporate HQs, semiconductor, banking, technology, etc... (Although the traffic is starting to suck worse than ever with all the folks from the coasts being lost and construction going on...) There's a large number corporate data jobs in the area needing to be filled. (Analyst, programmer, DBA, warehouse, BIG DATA superstars, whatever...) The Dallas Morning Snooze is not exactly a great…

I'm by no means arguing that the DMN is a great source for any tech or business news. I am arguing that it is the most read publication in the area and it is representative of what is deemed important by our populous. And what is deemed important by our populous is not startup and tech information. Now if you want to vote for the best burger/margarita/whogivesafuck in town, then you are in luck. There is not enough interest/understanding of the startup world in DFW to even be remotely considered a startup/technology hub or up and coming scene.

Re: IBM to Acquire SoftLayer

#66
post #6

IBM is buying SoftLayer to try to go head up with AWS. It's not going to work. Personally I won't buy an IBM product because I know it's just like Oracle: software entrapment. Nothing wrong with that business model it's just not one I want to be involved with. In other news, great job by SoftLayer to exit as pricing pressure from AWS and GoogleAppEngine was going to steadily erode their margins over time. I feel the…

I would be surprised if Rackspace sold out to Oracle, considering how Rackspace has a stated goal to fight patent trolls.

RackSpace also has a longstanding stated goal to make tons of money. Oracle is a quick way to meet that goal.

Re: IBM to Acquire SoftLayer

#67
post #5

Worth observing that for all the excitement about the recent crop of billion-dollar Silicon Valley startups, SoftLayer is based in Dallas, TX (and founded only in 2005). I suspect, and this will be easy enough to prove one way or the other after a few years so feel free to call me on it, that we'll see a disproportionate number of successful exits come from /outside/ the valley. My gut tells me that high-cost of livi…

"Disproportionate" to what though? People might tend to overestimate the ratio of companies like this inside the valley versus outside the valley.

Re: IBM to Acquire SoftLayer

#68

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The Dallas startup scene is exploding right now, especially for B2B companies. Geographic convenience to both coasts, low taxes, low living costs, high concentration of Fortune 500s and a lot of good talent itching to leave their cubicles. http://launchdfw.com/

How about the weather? I hear it is really hot in summer. Is it comparable to Pheonix?

It's comparable to Phoenix, if your point of reference is somewhere very mild like SF. While Dallas may have had a hot year, they only average 18 days > 99F[1], whereas Phoenix averages 109 days[2]. When you look at just the last handful of years, Phoenix has been having more than 30 days with a high above 110.

[1]: http://www.srh.noaa.gov/fwd/?n=d100info [2]: http://www.nws.noaa.gov/climate/xmacis.php?wfo=psr

All that said, yes it is typically quite dry in Phoenix. No, that does not make the heat somehow less significant. The sun scars the land and kills most life. It's a rough place to be.

Also, the tech scene there is quite meh. There's a few big data centers and some little companies hosting things in them, and there's GoDaddy, but there isn't much else. Don't even think about Phoenix over Dallas unless you really like hiking (that scene is amazing in PHX).

Re: IBM to Acquire SoftLayer

#69

Earlier quoted context omitted.

How about the weather? I hear it is really hot in summer. Is it comparable to Pheonix?

I believe it was last year that we had 100 days straight of 100+ degree weather. It's a beating... Pretty much Juneish - October are unbearable. The rest of the year is lovely.

The record of days over 100F (not consecutive days, but number of days in the year) was set in 2011, and it was 71 days http://www.srh.noaa.gov/fwd/?n=danncon10

For what it's worth, I wasn't seeking out info to disprove you, rather I was trying to make the argument that no humans should exist in Phoenix so I was collecting data on that. I thought you might like to have the measured figures.

Re: IBM to Acquire SoftLayer

#70
I was with ThePlanet for many years before the merger with SoftLayer. Up to that point they were very reasonably priced and offered great service. After the merge the prices nearly doubled and when re-negotiating my contract they basically gave me the impression I'm not a worthy customer due to the prices I was used to. They're after enterprise clients now and this acquisition just furthers that goal. As a small business owner I'm happy to be out and won't be returning to this company again.
Post reply on HN