Live data from Hacker News

The Cost of an ACL Injury

calv.info

41–50 of 179 posts

Re: The Cost of an ACL Injury

#41
I am actually 4 months out from my own ACL surgery, tore mine skiing and one thing the OP forgets to mention is many insurance will never pay that $60k as they have pre-negotiated rated with the hospitals and doctors. My surgery was done in SF (not the cheapest city in the world..) and according to the bill came out to just over 100k, but, my insurance paid 17k. What happen to the rest? Well I assume it was just inflated costs that the hospitals adds to the bill so the insurance can negotiate down.

Re: The Cost of an ACL Injury

#42

Earlier quoted context omitted.

We hear about medical tourism from the US to India, Thailand, etc., but with these kinds of price discrepancies between the US and UK private practices, I wonder why there aren't more Americans who go to the UK for surgery?

The fraction of patients without insurance but with enough cash and motivation to fly to the UK purely to seek savings on medical treatment has got to be fairly tiny. My impression is that medical tourism from the U.S. is not typically for cost savings, but rather because particular procedures are either completely unavailable (experimental stem cell treatments) or could require long wait times (liver transplants). I…

> The fraction of patients without insurance but with enough cash and motivation to fly to the UK purely to seek savings on medical treatment has got to be fairly tiny.

Well, if my options are to spend 60 grand on an ACL repair in the U.S., or significantly less than that on a first-class ticket to London, some serious fun, and an ACL repair...I know which one I would choose.

Re: The Cost of an ACL Injury

#44
Coming from the mobile app market where consumers are reluctant to spend 99 cents on your app/game, this is revolting. Something has to be done (in the medical field and in the mobile app field as well)

Re: The Cost of an ACL Injury

#46
It seems to me that the balance of power has shifted far over to the providers and away from the insurance companies. Would allowing more mergers give them more bargaining power and bring these costs down? Or is that just too simple?

Re: The Cost of an ACL Injury

#47
post #8

Excellent read. One point on disposing of fancy, potentially reusable, tools: We do more than a little precision machining in our lab. When a job matters, the shop buys new tooling. It's lower in cost, especially time, than verifying that a tool is sharp and correct. At first, it seems wasteful to throw away a once-used tool, but if all you do is critical work, you must be certain that your tools are reliable and cor…

To be fair, you're doing exceedingly delicate machine and test equipment manufacture. The machine shops I know will buy new tools as needed, but reuse them on large job runs--and throw them out once they lose tolerance.

Something like the $900 knife in the article is/could be a mass-produced stamped piece of metal, perhaps sharpened on-site or at the factory; unit cost for that should be easily less than $10.

Re: The Cost of an ACL Injury

#48
post #37

Interesting read, and a valid criticism of the costs associated with ACL repair in the US. It would be nice to know, however, how much your insurance company actually paid for the procedure. There's probably a large discrepancy there. My own thoughts are that if there were a true free market for healthcare, with insurance only for real medical emergencies, the costs of a lot of these services would drop, including ph…

You're right, there is a discrepancy and I didn't think to put it in the article.

I couldn't find the doctor's charges on-hand, but the total cost for the facilities/drugs/equipment was $48,851.82. The insurance ended up paying $14,742.88 of that post-adjustments.

Re: The Cost of an ACL Injury

#49
The most useful aspect of this article is the pie charts and line-item comparisons. Ignore the dollar amounts themselves. Why? Because almost no one pays that. Why?

- In California, MediCal (state-wide health insurance safety net) pays about 20% of the cost (not price) of treatment for those without insurance. So if a surgery costs $10k, MediCal says "Here's your $2k. That's all you get."

- Nationwide, Medicare pays something closer to 90%. Much better, but still a loss to the hospitals.

- Insurance companies negotiate with hospitals, but (from what I've heard) generally pay 115-125% of the cost, giving hospitals a 15-25% margin. Certainly better, but not necessarily making up for the above.

- Some patients with no insurance, especially at major academic medical centers, are rich folks looking trying to get the best care in the world for something particularly complicated. UCSF in my neighborhood even has an in-house Saudi liaison for Saudi royals. These folks pay the full rate, which may represent an enormous markup, which does help subsidize the care of the top two categories.

For those without insurance, who don't have the money to pay the full fare (meaning you're not a foreign prince or similar), you're going to get freaked out by the bill, which is based on the last category. But in reality, the moment you ask a billing person about the costs, you'll almost always get knocked down into the insurance rate tier, just for asking. Show proof that you have next to nothing, and you could get well down into MediCal levels.

In order to get the ultra-rich to subsidize the patients that generate the loss, the price card needs to be high. Really high. So they give breaks to everyone else, since you can't do it the other way -- "Oh, you look rich, so we're going to charge you double the rate sheet."

This doesn't happen in community hospitals quite as dramatically, since they don't have the ability to handle the crazy conditions that will result in the high-revenue customers. So their rack rate for an ACL will be at the low end, while the academic medical centers that offer the $2MM neurosurgery will have rack rates for every procedure on the high end.

Is it messed up? Sure. But does it mean that normal people are paying $65k for this ACL procedure? Usually not.

Post reply on HN