Live data from Hacker News

How to Do Philosophy

paulgraham.com

21–30 of 241 posts

Re: How to Do Philosophy

#21
post #20

Two points: 1. I'm actually very surprised at how many Ayn Rand fans there are on this site. For a fringe philosophy that has fewer followers than Scientology there seems to be an unusually high concentration here. I am a big Ayn Rand fan, so this is a pleasant surprise for me. 2. Ayn Rand's book Intorduction to Objectivist Epistemology is the most interesting book on the theory of concept formation I've read. I have…

I'm rereading The Fountainhead presently :)

Re: How to Do Philosophy

#22
"They were in effect arguing about artifacts induced by sampling at too low a resolution."

Sampling from what -- "meaning-space"?

Re: How to Do Philosophy

#23
I took one philosophy elective first semester of my undergrad and boy did it screw me.

For the longest time I kept asking my friends "how can you prove to me THAT tree is in fact a tree?" It was all part of realizing that current philosophy is just a play on words. I do believe that once you understand that, you can think beyond the frivolous debates.

Re: How to Do Philosophy

#25
"in fact, it would not be a bad definition of math to call it the study of terms that have precise meanings."

What meanings? I think that math is made of structure, not meaning. The latter is a human phenomenon. For example, a proof using geometry and one using algebra might be mathematically identical, but have different meanings (created when they are perceived).

Re: How to Do Philosophy

#26

Disappointing that this essay (like so many others) talks about Plato without mentioning Diogenes. Plato is the stuffed shirt know-it-all, and Diogenes is the smart-alecky devil's advocate ready to poke holes in Plato's ideas, thereby cutting him down a few notches: http://faculty.quinnipiac.edu/libraries/tballard/diogenes.ht... and http://members.optushome.com.au/davidquinn000/Diogenes%20Fol... Ultimately, Diogenes…

Ultimately, Diogenes is more important.

I don't see how you can say that. He left no work. All we have to judge him by is a few probably apocryphal stories.

Re: How to Do Philosophy

#28

Sorry to post twice, but this is a pet topic. Software is applied philosophy. Where else can you deal with everything that western philosophy offers, from classification to epistemology to the philosophy of language and science -- and at the end of the day produce something that has immediate value for someone? All of this working, real-world stuff we're doing, from heuristics to machine learning and meta-programming…

Everything is applied philosophy. That's the point!

Re: How to Do Philosophy

#29
I haven't finished reading yet, but for what it's worth, I'm having trouble parsing this sentence:

Few were sufficiently correct that people have forgotten who discovered what they discovered.

Re: How to Do Philosophy

#30

Disappointing that this essay (like so many others) talks about Plato without mentioning Diogenes. Plato is the stuffed shirt know-it-all, and Diogenes is the smart-alecky devil's advocate ready to poke holes in Plato's ideas, thereby cutting him down a few notches: http://faculty.quinnipiac.edu/libraries/tballard/diogenes.ht... and http://members.optushome.com.au/davidquinn000/Diogenes%20Fol... Ultimately, Diogenes…

Uh, have you read Plato's dialogues? The defining characteristic is that they aren't philosophical treatises, i.e. not pedantic monologues claiming all knowledge. Their whole point is to stimulate the reader to think for themselves on very interesting questions.
Post reply on HN