Live data from Hacker News

RMS lifestyle

stallman.org

181–190 of 229 posts

Re: RMS lifestyle

#181
post #171

This thread reflects how little HN has to do with hacker culture those days. I read the article and enjoyed very much his description of the process by which he learns foreign languages and how he tries to make maximum use of every bit of free time. Then I went to the comments and saw the batshit comments about ties. Time to rename the site to "Hater News".

Hacker News is too much about becoming rich to have much love for Stallman.

Re: RMS lifestyle

#182

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Is that really what he means though? Most people use the word "breakfast" to refer to the first meal of the day (or lack thereof) eaten within a few hours of waking up. Also the type of food. If you sleep in on a Saturday until noon, you'll probably tend to want breakfast food when you first wake up. The time of day is far behind those two factors for what constitutes breakfast in popular usage.

> If you sleep in on a Saturday until noon, you'll probably tend to want breakfast food when you first wake up. It's 9am on a Saturday here and I just ate two slices of cold pizza. Not everyone desires "breakfast food" first thing in the moring. :)

Of course I wasn't saying that applies in every single case. I even double-qualified that part ("probably tend to"), but you still responded with "not everyone." I give up. :)

Re: RMS lifestyle

#184

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> If you sleep in on a Saturday until noon, you'll probably tend to want breakfast food when you first wake up. It's 9am on a Saturday here and I just ate two slices of cold pizza. Not everyone desires "breakfast food" first thing in the moring. :)

Of course I wasn't saying that applies in every single case. I even double-qualified that part ("probably tend to"), but you still responded with "not everyone." I give up. :)

"Among English speakers, "breakfast" can be used to refer to [the first meal of the day] or to refer to a meal composed of traditional breakfast foods (such as eggs, oatmeal and sausage) served at any time of day." [1]

Even Wikipedia doesn't have a strict definition. I propose a standards committee meet to disambiguate this once and for all.

[1.] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Breakfast

Re: RMS lifestyle

#186
post #69

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Dare I point out that his personal preferences in ties are the topic RMS spends the most amount of text on?

I thought his opinion on ties (or really on the social pressure of ties) was one of the more interesting sections. BTW, he uses more text to describe his taste in music.

I think the principle he talked about using the "ties" allegory was the most interesting part:

"The people who wear ties under these circumstances are victim-coperpetrators: each one who cedes to this pressure and wears a tie increases the pressure on others. This is a central concept for understanding other forms of propagating nastiness, including nonfree software and Facebook. In fact, it was in regard to ties that I first recognized this phenomenon.

I don't condemn victim-coperpetrators, since they are primarily victims and only secondarily perpetrators. But I believe I should not be one of them. I hope my refusal to wear a tie will make it easier for others to refuse as well."

I don't really see wearing or not wearing ties as some kind of moral imperative.

Re: RMS lifestyle

#187

It's Stallman's own title, but a much more accurate title would be "RMS Opinions" I think it's interesting for that reason though, because it doesn't say as much about his actual lifestyle as it does what he thinks about other people. For instance: > As a matter of principle, I refuse to own a tie. Tells us more about an opinion he's made about other people. If he wanted to be more descriptive of his lifestyle, he co…

We all know that person that takes his counter-culture shtick too seriously. Hell, maybe many of us were that person at some point. I know I did although I never reached RMS-level. The difference is that regarding RMS this is consequence of his substantial and well warranted philosophy on free software and freedom in general and he has his life's work to prove it. In short, he is not doing out of self-righteousness or to be perceived "cool".

Re: RMS lifestyle

#188

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It is more fundamental than that: religion does not offer any falsifiable claims. It is not that we do not apply the scientific method to it. It is that, by design , religion is out of bounds of the scientific method.

> It is more fundamental than that: religion does not offer any falsifiable claims Most religions offer plenty. In the Bible for example, age and creation of the world, the great flood, praying can cure you, God punishes bad people, etc. The claims that have been falsified are nowadays interpreted as "metaphorical" stories.

The claims are not really falsifiable, because when you're dealing with a literal deus†, any premise of the scientific method - such as, floods affect the ecosystems and leave evidence - is invalidated.

†As in deus ex machina.

Re: RMS lifestyle

#189
post #85

Stallman on Harry Potter: > I don't say you shouldn't read these books. That I leave to the author. I only urge you not to pay for them. Quite the upstanding citizen. His justification for this is even more bizarre, he accuses JK Rowling of something hypothetical: > Suppose that the mistakenly sold Harry Potter books had been ebooks: then instead of ordering her fans not to read her books, Rowling could have ordered…

> I don't say you shouldn't read these books. That I leave to the author. I only urge you not to pay for them.

Quite the upstanding citizen.

What's your issue with it? Is it wrong to read without paying for it, now? Personally, I like libraries.

Re: RMS lifestyle

#190
post #94

How does he reconcile using somebody else's cell phone to make a call if he's not willing to use one himself?

He doesn't say that owning a cellphone is wrong; he says he doesn't want to be tracked by using one. Using someone else's doesn't help track that person (they're being tracked regardless), so why would it be contradictory?
Post reply on HN