Amidst the general decline in quality of publications on the Web, it's great to see Wired , which put out lots of fluffy, inaccurate stuff in the past, publishing so many solid, interesting articles. This was fun to read, had actual equations and graphs, and made sense. I remember reading the headline about charging a phone in 20 seconds and not bothering to look at the details, because, no way.
Nobody uses mica capacitors for high energy-density applications, electrochemical EDLC's have much higher energy densities.
Furthermore switching regulators that can operate the phone relatively independent of input voltage are cheap and efficient.
Yes the other articles about this were bizarre, no, cell phone battery replacement (where nobody seems to mind plugging them in at night, and ED is king) are not a good application for any capacitor in the foreseeable future, but this article is hardly better.
More nitpicks: "The news reports don’t actually state how much energy the storage device can store."
when the story showed up on HN, I searched google news for a few words from the headline and found the ED in one of the top 5 links. I don't remember the exact number, but it was on the order of a SLA starter battery (so lower than a deep-cycle SLA battery). Clearly not in cell-phone territory.