why this instead of bootstrap?
Wonderful. If there is a thread about bootstrap, some one posts "why must everything be bootstrap?" Get a thread about a bootstrap alternative and...... bingo!!!! (Not having a go at you personally, Im sure your question was genuine. Just making general observation of the irony)
Topcoat – CSS for clean and fast web apps
21–30 of 101 posts
Re: Topcoat – CSS for clean and fast web apps
#22The buttons remind me of 90s operating systems.
Re: Topcoat – CSS for clean and fast web apps
#23Is it just me, or is the proliferation of CSS frameworks and JS frameworks/libs redundant now?
Came here to say it. Just saw in the job posting for Amicus: "Open source projects, including our own in house, soon to be open sourced, real time Model View Presenter javascript framework with bi-directional data binding" Are the existing libs so bad everyone has to reinvent the wheel constantly?
In a sense we need our MFC for the web.
Re: Topcoat – CSS for clean and fast web apps
#24edit: I'll post this as an edit since there are multiple responses referring to http://www.getskeleton.com. Skeleton is similar to what I'm asking for but it seems to have stopped short. I would love to see unstyled carousels, alerts, modals, sticky headers, images with inline comments, etc. Basically, all the really nice stuff you get in Bootstrap and Foundation but without any of the styling.
Re: Topcoat – CSS for clean and fast web apps
#25I would personally like to see a CSS framework that has absolutely zero opinions about design. Meaning, radio buttons are actually the standard html5 radio buttons, but perhaps with titles handled in a unified way that works across all browsers. Form elements are given proper layout CSS that solves a lot of common issues across all browsers but no additional styling is added. Etc. I don't want my site to look like ye…
Re: Topcoat – CSS for clean and fast web apps
#26I would personally like to see a CSS framework that has absolutely zero opinions about design. Meaning, radio buttons are actually the standard html5 radio buttons, but perhaps with titles handled in a unified way that works across all browsers. Form elements are given proper layout CSS that solves a lot of common issues across all browsers but no additional styling is added. Etc. I don't want my site to look like ye…
Re: Topcoat – CSS for clean and fast web apps
#27I would personally like to see a CSS framework that has absolutely zero opinions about design. Meaning, radio buttons are actually the standard html5 radio buttons, but perhaps with titles handled in a unified way that works across all browsers. Form elements are given proper layout CSS that solves a lot of common issues across all browsers but no additional styling is added. Etc. I don't want my site to look like ye…
Re: Topcoat – CSS for clean and fast web apps
#28I would personally like to see a CSS framework that has absolutely zero opinions about design. Meaning, radio buttons are actually the standard html5 radio buttons, but perhaps with titles handled in a unified way that works across all browsers. Form elements are given proper layout CSS that solves a lot of common issues across all browsers but no additional styling is added. Etc. I don't want my site to look like ye…
I will say though that Foundation is much easier to customize styles for than Bootstrap, which is one of the primary reasons we now use Bootstrap for internal apps or side projects which we don't intend to implement a custom design, but Foundation for all sites which we plan on designing.
Re: Topcoat – CSS for clean and fast web apps
#29I would personally like to see a CSS framework that has absolutely zero opinions about design. Meaning, radio buttons are actually the standard html5 radio buttons, but perhaps with titles handled in a unified way that works across all browsers. Form elements are given proper layout CSS that solves a lot of common issues across all browsers but no additional styling is added. Etc. I don't want my site to look like ye…
Re: Topcoat – CSS for clean and fast web apps
#30I'm finding it hard to think up ways that this differentiates itself enough from Foundation or Bootstrap to be useful -- and your website isn't providing me any reason why as well. Compare to http://twitter.github.io/bootstrap/ and http://foundation.zurb.com/ , which list some benefits right on the page -- you need people to instantly understand why they should use your framework over another css framework. Also, mak…
Looks like it's an Adobe project.