Earlier quoted context omitted.
Every number has special properties :) Edit: In fact, I'd be astounded to encounter a number that did not exhibit any special properties. Until, of course, one makes "having no special properties" a special property. In that case, I would no longer be astounded.
We proceed by induction. Clearly n =1 is special, as it divides every integer. Assume k is special. If k +1 is not special, then it is special, as it is the first non-special number to come after a special number. This is a contradiction; then k +1 is special. ■
42
11–20 of 62 posts
Re: 42
#1242
For-tea-two
Tea for two
Re: 42
#13The explanation that I liked the most was: 42 For-tea-two Tea for two
Re: 42
#14Is this guy a, genius?
Re: 42
#15http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=6%20times%209...
Re: 42
#16The explanation that I liked the most was: 42 For-tea-two Tea for two
I was never quite sure whether the number (42) or the decimal representation thereof (4*10 + 2) was relevant. Your interpretation would tend to the latter…
Re: 42
#17Earlier quoted context omitted.
Every number has special properties :) Edit: In fact, I'd be astounded to encounter a number that did not exhibit any special properties. Until, of course, one makes "having no special properties" a special property. In that case, I would no longer be astounded.
We proceed by induction. Clearly n =1 is special, as it divides every integer. Assume k is special. If k +1 is not special, then it is special, as it is the first non-special number to come after a special number. This is a contradiction; then k +1 is special. ■
Re: 42
#18Re: 42
#19Re: 42
#20[deleted]