Live data from Hacker News

Ubuntu 9.04 released

ubuntu.com

31–40 of 122 posts

Re: Ubuntu 9.04 released

#31
post #5

I'm excited for the next iteration when they revamp the default theme. Ubuntu owns but it needs to look prettier out of the box to really grab prospective switchers.

I love Ubuntu's default look, better than Windows or Mac. The lack of blue is very refreshing; the brown looks great.

Re: Ubuntu 9.04 released

#32
post #5

I'm excited for the next iteration when they revamp the default theme. Ubuntu owns but it needs to look prettier out of the box to really grab prospective switchers.

The default theme for PCLOS Gnome tempted me to try it and as a result convert from Ubuntu. The distro first has to look nice to get people interested and then work well to keep them on it.

Re: Ubuntu 9.04 released

#33
post #10
post #5

I'm excited for the next iteration when they revamp the default theme. Ubuntu owns but it needs to look prettier out of the box to really grab prospective switchers.

I can only suggest to try using the Dust Theme. It can be found in the package gnome-themes-ubuntu.

Actually, you don't need to install anything. Dust is one of the default themes now :)

Re: Ubuntu 9.04 released

#34
post #11
post #4

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I've never met someone who used any version of windows because they thought it was a reasonable way to interface with your computer, always for application compatibility.

I've been using it for about 10 years. Application compatibility is only a small part of why I stick with it. (I have tried multiple Linux distributions and OS X)

What are your other reasons?

Re: Ubuntu 9.04 released

#35
post #34
post #11

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I've been using it for about 10 years. Application compatibility is only a small part of why I stick with it. (I have tried multiple Linux distributions and OS X)

What are your other reasons?

Many and varied, but most importantly because I actually like Windows.

Re: Ubuntu 9.04 released

#36
post #24

Ubuntu is a fantastic distribution of a magnificent OS. I just wish I could run design apps like Flash and Photoshop on it (and no, GIMP just doesn't do it for me).

I find VMWare performs quite well for that stuff. Still, I don't want to use Windows even in that scenario. So I just use a Mac instead. I think if just Photoshop had a decent counterpart on *nix that'd be enough to get me to switch.

I'm in a similar boat with the GP.

The main obstacle for migrating completely is a handful of the usual software titles, and tablet support. For tablet computers, like it or not, Vista is still the best, hands down.

But my jaw just dropped with the out-of-the-box support in Jaunty. It is marvellous. If multi monitor works just as smoothly, today might just be the day.

How well does VMWare work for you? My guest OSes are always as lean as possible with all graphics stripped out, and they are still laggy.

Re: Ubuntu 9.04 released

#37
post #33
post #10

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I can only suggest to try using the Dust Theme. It can be found in the package gnome-themes-ubuntu.

Actually, you don't need to install anything. Dust is one of the default themes now :)

Ah, cool, didn't know that. This definitely is an advance :-)

Re: Ubuntu 9.04 released

#39
post #15

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Can someone with knowledge of the underlying OS mechanisms answer this for me: What is the deal with file access on Windows? In Linux (on the Mac too, I think) I can move, copy and delete files freely, regardless of what applications currently have that file open. On Windows, I always run into some situation where it won't let me do what I want to do because the file is open. So I have to hunt through 10-20 windows t…

This happens because of underlying implementation of file systems. UNIX-based systems have the notion of "linking/unlinking" files: a file is a link to a set of sectors on your hard drive. One can create many more links to the same data (using ln command). Deleting is the same as unlinking, i.e. removing a link. When the last link disappears, the file is considered "deleted". When an application opens a file, it crea…

Windows has had hard links for a decade or so. Vista even ships with "mklink" which can make three different kinds of links. Before that, you could download utilities to make them. Windows won't unlink a link that is in use because its normal filesystem API promises that behavior. You can use different APIs to get different behavior.

The registry exists in the format it is in to boost performance, not hinder performance. It supports approximately the same ACLs as the filesystem so there is nothing that makes it inherently less secure than the filesystem. And, the registry is designed to be exposed by custom GUIs, not by regedit. For example, to change the registry setting for the default program to open ".html" files with, you could* use regedit, but the Windows philosphy says there should be a dedicated UI for it instead (the "Default Programs" UI in this case).

Post reply on HN