Live data from Hacker News

Soylent Campaign

campaign.soylent.me

311–320 of 608 posts

Re: Soylent Campaign

#311
post #262
post #251

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The founder has been doing this for 4 months and he is healthier than when he started. What makes you think this is a bad idea other than "waaahh they are not food scientists!"?

[deleted]

Your only argument is an argument from authority. Sorry, I'm just not impressed at all.

Re: Soylent Campaign

#312
post #288
post #239

[deleted]

I'm sitting this one out for a year. I expected Rob to run longer and more detailed trails than it appears he has. As in a few hundred people eating nothing but Soylent for a year. There will be problems with the initial manufacture, and he highlights them in the risks section. But I notice the lack of anyone from say a pharma QC background who would be able to control the risk of overdosing on an ingredient by prope…

[deleted]

Re: Soylent Campaign

#313
post #290

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If you think that a sample of 1 is enough to validate the safety of this substance, then you need to just stop commenting on this article. You have absolutely no idea how science works.

It is not a "substance". This is basically a multivitamin mixed in with some fluor, some whey protein and some olive oil. You only need common sense to validate the safety.

But that's the point - they claim it's safe for anyone; that it will correct cholesterol; that it's okay if you have problems with digestion; etc.

You only need common sense to realise that this single product cannot be safe for everyone.

What type of flour does it contain? They say it's hypo-allergenic, so it shouldn't have any gluten in.

Re: Soylent Campaign

#314

I think HN's hatred of Soylent has been increasing exponentially as we get closer to a mass-market release. What's with all the negativity? If you don't like it, don't buy it -- easy as that. It may not be the perfect product, but at least it's pushing some boundaries. I, for one, am excited to get my hands on a batch and let the results speak for themselves.

Maybe the fact their branding and marketing copy is a paragon of hyperbole and ambiguity could have something to do with a hostile reception on a site with a relatively marketing- and logic-savvy readership. I'd be hard-pressed to come up with more dystopian PR than this, to the point where you have to wonder if it's satire.

I wouldn't even consider ingesting this mystery powder, even if they paid me.

Re: Soylent Campaign

#315
post #239

[deleted]

Rather than have everyone in this thread call someone from your list of food scientists at UBC, perhaps you could call one and post the conversation for us. This would be a bit less time consuming for the food scientists.

No need, here's a perfectly good breakdown from 2 months ago: http://www.businessinsider.com/rob-rhinehart-food-substitute...

Re: Soylent Campaign

#316
post #91

"We have been testing Soylent on ourselves for several months and the data shows it to have a positive nutritional benefit." No shit. Seriously, who is going to try this powder made by this twenty-somethings guys with no background in any kind of health nor nutrition studies. It reminds me to the Power Balance scam http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Power_Balance

Apparently 1,016 backers, with $130,000 kicking about, at last count.

Re: Soylent Campaign

#317
post #275
post #255

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Wow, 4 months really is a long time! I always thought drug companies were slow testing new drugs out for years! He is healthier than when he started? By what metric and for how long will that last?

This is not a new drug, it's just regular nutrients in powder form.

...that the suppliers claim will stay stable for years. How have they tested that?

Re: Soylent Campaign

#318
post #239

[deleted]

Rather than have everyone in this thread call someone from your list of food scientists at UBC, perhaps you could call one and post the conversation for us. This would be a bit less time consuming for the food scientists.

[deleted]

Re: Soylent Campaign

#319
I'm calling it: Soylent is the Pets.com of this investment cycle. Ironically dog food is probably more nutritionally balanced than Soylent, which is almost beyond parody.

Re: Soylent Campaign

#320
post #239

[deleted]

I read his blog posts leading up to this and liked the idea. So, I decided to try it myself. After many revisions, I finally figured out a good way of doing it and it ended up being more expensive than just eating regular grilled chicken, sweet potatoes, etc.

He is using Maltodextrin for carbs. It likely contains Glutamic Acid and has a horrible glycemic index. You might as well eat sugar. I don't know what he is using for protein; but, I guarantee it sucks. The correct approach would be to use cross flow microfiltered whey protein because it retains all of the essential amino acids. It's also as expensive as Greenwise/Whole Foods chicken. Cheaper methods tend to lose certain essential amino acids.

Another issue is the absence of toxins. Believe it or not, consuming the toxins contained in whole foods makes us more robust. There is actual research that has analyzed these effects.

Post reply on HN