Live data from Hacker News

D-Wave: Truth finally starts to emerge

scottaaronson.com

11–20 of 97 posts

Re: D-Wave: Truth finally starts to emerge

#11
Probably the biggest point to take away from the article is this:

> For years, I tirelessly repeated that D-Wave hadn’t even provided evidence that its qubits were entangled—and that, while you can have entanglement with no quantum speedup, you can’t possibly have a quantum speedup without at least the capacity to generate entanglement. Now, I’d say, D-Wave finally has cleared the evidence-for-entanglement bar—and, while they’re not the first to do so with superconducting qubits, they’re certainly the first to do so with so many superconducting qubits.

In other words, this is the first actual evidence that D-Wave even has the potential for quantum speedup.

Re: D-Wave: Truth finally starts to emerge

#12
post #6

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I understand some of the words, but the article itself seems to me as ancient Greek. Can someone explain to me what the hell the whole story is about?

One could write many books on this subject. What exactly did you not understand?

I would just like a recap of the story for a layman. You know the sort of thing one would do to explain a computer system to his mother. The sort of thing Brian Greene does to explain string theory to the masses.

Re: D-Wave: Truth finally starts to emerge

#13

I'm glad there are people who understand these things. I hope some day when the field of quantum computing congeals a bit more us mere mortals can begin to understand it as well.

Yeah, I felt smart until I read this. Now I know how all those "business people" feel in meetings with their devs.

Re: D-Wave: Truth finally starts to emerge

#14
post #2

Holy Quantum Annealing Qubits Batman! That article was not for the faint of geek.

I understand some of the words, but the article itself seems to me as ancient Greek. Can someone explain to me what the hell the whole story is about?

QC is hard because it requires that the qbits be entangled with each other, but not interacting at all with the rest of the universe. This is comparable to trying to eat rice without a fork, or chopsticks, or allowing air to touch the rice. QC is very, very hard. It is entirely possible we won't see useful QC machines for decades, or even centuries.

D-Wave has attracted scepticism because in the many press releases they've issued over the last 14 years, they have repeatedly claimed to have made breakthroughs in quantum computing that would be perhaps 200 years before their time, if they weren't lying. Like a Chinese manufacturer saying they'll be selling an $11 phone next spring that has petabytes of ram, and can run a simulation of a human brain in real time, which the phone uses for accurate voice transcription.

D-Wave have finally, finally demonstrated a machine with a working qbit system. But the qbits are strongly coupled to the environment, and the machine runs many times slower than a classical electronic computer, even in the fake benchmarking problem that is the only thing the D-Wave machine can solve.

It is an important step on the road to usable quantum computing. It is not a general-purpose quantum computer. It can't be used for prime factorization, for instance.

Re: D-Wave: Truth finally starts to emerge

#15

Probably the biggest point to take away from the article is this: > For years, I tirelessly repeated that D-Wave hadn’t even provided evidence that its qubits were entangled—and that, while you can have entanglement with no quantum speedup, you can’t possibly have a quantum speedup without at least the capacity to generate entanglement. Now, I’d say, D-Wave finally has cleared the evidence-for-entanglement bar—and, w…

I love this idea of having a computing system that might not work as advertised but still produce the right results in a repeatable manner. When the ESA had a computing system that did not work as advertised, they blew up the GNP of an african country and went straight to the textbooks.

Re: D-Wave: Truth finally starts to emerge

#17
A really long time ago when I was in grad school playing with genetic algorithms and simulated annealing, I implemented something that seems awfully similar to quantum adiabatic annealing. It worked as follows:

1. Assign all states of each variable equal probability.

2. Sample the living crap out of the search space with some sort of energy function for every possible configuration, scoring the discrete values of the variables of each individual sample by Boltzmann weighting of the energy function.

3. Every so often update the weights for selecting each variables potential values using the accumulated scores for each variable generated during step 2.

4. Repeat steps 2 through 3 until each variable converges to a single state.

I never published anything but I learned three things from this process.

1. It worked like gangbusters to find the space surrounding global optima of reasonably complex functions

2. It worked like crap to refine really good solutions into really great solutions.

3. It was horribly dependent on the underlying representation of the variables (i.e. if you mapped the input variables to a spin glass, it was just awful)

That and I suspect somebody already has a fancy name for exactly what I did back then...

Re: D-Wave: Truth finally starts to emerge

#18

Probably the biggest point to take away from the article is this: > For years, I tirelessly repeated that D-Wave hadn’t even provided evidence that its qubits were entangled—and that, while you can have entanglement with no quantum speedup, you can’t possibly have a quantum speedup without at least the capacity to generate entanglement. Now, I’d say, D-Wave finally has cleared the evidence-for-entanglement bar—and, w…

But there is poor to no evidence that adding more qubits scales linearly or exponentially or worse case at all and what we have is a probability of entanglement across a group of qubits

Maybe

Re: D-Wave: Truth finally starts to emerge

#19
post #16
post #9

Is there a SDK? I'd like to port a NES simulator. (there is a conjecture that anything remotely able to do an addition will be used for emulating a Nintendo console)

Someone will ask how many Bitcoins this computer can mine any minute now!

All of them?
Post reply on HN