Live data from Hacker News

Your running shoes are a lie

dailymail.co.uk

41–46 of 46 posts

Re: Your running shoes are a lie

#41
I would provide a personal anecdote:

The shoes I use (I did not like Vibrams) are http://feelmax.com/panka_leather.html. They have a very thin (3mm?) kevlar compound outsole to protect the foot from glass, sharp rocks etc. It is thin enough to fully feel the ground texture underfoot. I am a bicyclist, so aside from a few trials, my experience is limited to "barefoot" walking.

According to the fairly reasonable theory that the human foot and leg is best suited for toe-stepping (like most animals), not the heel, I also modified my gait to stepping on the ball of the foot. After an adjustment period (and finding some pretty much unused leg muscles), it provides for a far more fluid movement, with the leg muscles and ligaments acting as shock absorbers. Trying heel-stepping thereafter brings to focus the fairly harsh impact each step actually causes in that mode of transportation. Plus toe-stepping helps keeping balance on slippery surfaces.

Re: Your running shoes are a lie

#42

This is an interesting idea for discussion, but I think the author handles it very poorly. Yes, it's entirely possible that high-end running shoes aren't helping us as much as we think they are. Yes, it's possible that there's a correlation between high priced running shoes and injuries. On the other hand, the author claims a lot of things that are simply ludicrous: "Logically, that should be obvious - the impact on…

> If my head was moving at 10mph towards brick wall, a half-inch of dense rubber would probably make a whole lot of difference.

Once, yes it would help. Do that a few thousand times, you'll still get brain damage.

Re: Your running shoes are a lie

#44

OK, I'm convinced. I should at least try out less on my foot. I'm not willing to go barefoot though because I live in a concrete (and broken glass) city and every business would turn me away at the door. So.. on to find a simpler shoe. One would assume that putting less on my foot would cost less, right? http://www.vivobarefoot.com/ - looks nice, but at multiple times the price of my current shoes.. ok thinking back…

Hmm, I wonder if aquasocks could do the trick (they're fairly inexpensive), though durability comes to mind.

Re: Your running shoes are a lie

#45

OK, I'm convinced. I should at least try out less on my foot. I'm not willing to go barefoot though because I live in a concrete (and broken glass) city and every business would turn me away at the door. So.. on to find a simpler shoe. One would assume that putting less on my foot would cost less, right? http://www.vivobarefoot.com/ - looks nice, but at multiple times the price of my current shoes.. ok thinking back…

This reviewer on barefootrunner.com really liked water shoes: http://www.barefootrunner.com/2009/03/review-wateraqua-shoes...

Re: Your running shoes are a lie

#46
post #12

I run 5 miles barefoot every day. It's seriously so much more enjoyable than running with shoes on ever was. In fact, I didn't run at ALL until I went barefoot. It is also a very tough, rewarding workout on the right surface - for example, I run on soft sand (which, by the way, is the best way to run if you want to save your knees). My best friend is a varsity track athlete who swears by his running shoes. We always…

I'd be frightened of stepping on something sharp and slicing my foot open.
Post reply on HN