Live data from Hacker News

Gmail: Introducing Actions in the Inbox

googleappsdeveloper.blogspot.co.uk

21–30 of 147 posts

Re: Gmail: Introducing Actions in the Inbox

#21
post #14
post #5

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yeah. There are so many positive possibilities yet a large group of people still choose to focus on the negative side. I hope this can change one day

[deleted]

> This thread is hilarious. Keep your heads in the sand.

Does everyone need to get excited for features that existed in Outlook ca. 2000 A.D. just because they are wrapped in a shiny Web 2.0 veneer?

Re: Gmail: Introducing Actions in the Inbox

#22
post #21
post #14

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[deleted]

> This thread is hilarious. Keep your heads in the sand. Does everyone need to get excited for features that existed in Outlook ca. 2000 A.D. just because they are wrapped in a shiny Web 2.0 veneer?

It did? Using an open format? I've never heard of that. Do you know the name of the feature?

Re: Gmail: Introducing Actions in the Inbox

#23

Earlier quoted context omitted.

How many spam/phising emails do you actually get in your Gmail? And of those, how many are DKIM/SPF signed?

The people targeted by phishing attacks have no idea what those terms mean.

It doesn't matter. Gmail does, and they block the feature for any sender which doesn't sign their emails.

https://developers.google.com/gmail/schemas/actions/securing...

Re: Gmail: Introducing Actions in the Inbox

#24
Hmm.

Making a universal email message have bespoke instructions for a specific mail provider. Call me old fashioned but I don't like that. Infact I still like to read my e-mails in plain text.

Also, I dare say, not so useful for the many of us accessing gmail via Mac devices' mail clients.

Re: Gmail: Introducing Actions in the Inbox

#26
post #7

I don't get it, wouldn't an html email with a form element do the same thing?

The buttons appear in the subject line in your inbox, so you can click them without opening the mail first. I think the use cases are fairly limited, but I can think of a few interesting ones (for example, bugzilla notifications could link directly to the bugzilla page, mailing lists could have a "manage subscription" button, etc)

Re: Gmail: Introducing Actions in the Inbox

#27

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The people targeted by phishing attacks have no idea what those terms mean.

It doesn't matter. Gmail does, and they block the feature for any sender which doesn't sign their emails. https://developers.google.com/gmail/schemas/actions/securing...

I routinely send emails through a mail server that doesn't sign them and they are delivered to Gmail recipients just fine.

Re: Gmail: Introducing Actions in the Inbox

#30
post #27

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It doesn't matter. Gmail does, and they block the feature for any sender which doesn't sign their emails. https://developers.google.com/gmail/schemas/actions/securing...

I routinely send emails through a mail server that doesn't sign them and they are delivered to Gmail recipients just fine.

Sorry, I edited the post. They block that feature, not the whole mail.
Post reply on HN