31–40 of 71 posts
ZTE produces tons of Android devices for this amount or slightly less. The ZTE Blade being one example: which has been out three or four years. This seems less "impressive" and more "impressive marketing." Why are we reading about this? How does it advance anything? A worse phone for slightly more money, because it has "Nokia" on the front?
EDIT: I was wrong about 'recognizing it anywhere', this article isn't from an Indian publication. No offense.
This "used-car salesman" undertone, wordily mulling over the same points, and over the top praise are very typical of most Indian magazines and newspapers even. I'm not trying to be nasty here, even I am Indian and not a native speaker of English. I just find this style of writing very amusing and can recognize it anywhere. :-) EDIT: I was wrong about 'recognizing it anywhere', this article isn't from an Indian publi…
Hardly impressive - fairly pathetic really. Observe: http://androidandme.com/2013/04/smartphones-2/archos-reveals... http://www.androidforcheap.com/cell-phone-android-phone-c-58... http://www.pandawill.com/mobile-phone-c1/android-os-phone-c5... etc. Just Google around for tons more. Generally better in just about every way, and running a real OS that can run real apps.
Can I put Android on it?
A nice, cheap, small phone with dual-sim? Isn't this just like every other Asha phone they make?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I think there was a quad core 1080p Chinese phone for $160, too. Considering these are running Symbian, that's a lot less value for buck compared to an Android one, even if the price is "low". EDIT: This one iOcean X7 - quad core 1.2 Cortex A7, 1080p screen, PowerVR 5XT (1080p video support), 2 GB of RAM, 13 MP camera. Now that's impressive. And it doesn't look too bad either: http://android-sale.com/iocean-x7-phone.…
of course, there are a lot of them, but what about the quality of them ... ?