11–20 of 41 posts
Why exactly are these reminiscent pieces other than verifying that the past really existed getting upvotes lately?
Probably because it's interesting? I never saw the web in its infancy like this. I've spent hours browsing archive.org before to see what the early days of the internet was like back then.
http://techcrunch.com/2008/08/25/yahoos-404-at-giants-stadiu...
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Probably because it's interesting? I never saw the web in its infancy like this. I've spent hours browsing archive.org before to see what the early days of the internet was like back then.
Note the Yahoo logo image map. :)
Why exactly are these reminiscent pieces other than verifying that the past really existed getting upvotes lately?
Probably because it's interesting? I never saw the web in its infancy like this. I've spent hours browsing archive.org before to see what the early days of the internet was like back then.
Why exactly are these reminiscent pieces other than verifying that the past really existed getting upvotes lately?
Probably because it's interesting? I never saw the web in its infancy like this. I've spent hours browsing archive.org before to see what the early days of the internet was like back then.
Why exactly are these reminiscent pieces other than verifying that the past really existed getting upvotes lately?