Call me a simpleton or luddite if you will, but I don't even have a regular printer at my home and I don't see a good reason to have a 3D printer either. Also, a non-techie like my brother (who probably wouldnt use this anyways) can barely install Microsoft Word, so telling him to print off a gun is an aggressive leap forward. I just don't understand what good these types of articles play or what practice purpose the…
World's first 3D printed gun test fired
11–20 of 81 posts
Re: World's first 3D printed gun test fired
#12I always wonder why these articles don't mention that the ability to personally make a gun with a CNC machine has existed for quite a few years. There isn't a lot of new ground being broken in terms of "Freedom to create firearms in your home" with 3D printing.
Re: World's first 3D printed gun test fired
#13As the saying goes: Hydrogen bombs don't kill people, people do.
Re: World's first 3D printed gun test fired
#14Countries whose primary gun control measures are currently at the point of sale will have to decide pretty soon if they're going to ban personal 3D printers or resign themselves to the fact that as in the US, the average petty criminal will have access to guns.
3D printing the parts only slightly increases the convenience from using a drill press and an '80%' receiver.
Re: World's first 3D printed gun test fired
#15Re: World's first 3D printed gun test fired
#16I always wonder why these articles don't mention that the ability to personally make a gun with a CNC machine has existed for quite a few years. There isn't a lot of new ground being broken in terms of "Freedom to create firearms in your home" with 3D printing.
A CNC requires specialised skill. Downloading and printing 3d doesn't.
Building guns with a CNC requires a lot of labour. Whereas you can imagine having a lab full of 3d printers being operated by a single pensioner.
3d printers look like they'll be generic and mass-produced. If so, in ten years there will be 3d printers everywhere. People sitting in refugee camps on the edge of hotzones won't have have difficulty getting access to them. At some time in the near future there will be a good-enough equivalent to the assault rifle that can be 3d printed. And drones. And other things.
The US has avoided pouring arms into Syria partly out of concern for the mess that it will leave behind afterwards. Also, they're wanting to avoid arming people hostile to the west. These arguments are valid now, but we can see the end of it.
Re: World's first 3D printed gun test fired
#17I always wonder why these articles don't mention that the ability to personally make a gun with a CNC machine has existed for quite a few years. There isn't a lot of new ground being broken in terms of "Freedom to create firearms in your home" with 3D printing.
Re: World's first 3D printed gun test fired
#18Re: World's first 3D printed gun test fired
#19I am against control in general because it limits creativity and innovation but I am not sure it is in everyone's interest to let weapons flow freely and without any possible limitation.
Re: World's first 3D printed gun test fired
#20Countries whose primary gun control measures are currently at the point of sale will have to decide pretty soon if they're going to ban personal 3D printers or resign themselves to the fact that as in the US, the average petty criminal will have access to guns.
Guns aren't, and never have been, the thing that you need to regulate to keep down gun crime.
Bullets are.
If you have a gun, you have a gun for life. But if you don't have a never-ending supply of bullets, you might as well have a paperweight.
Bullets are harder to get and harder to make than guns will ever be. Being able to make your own gun means nothing unless you have something to put in it.