Earlier quoted context omitted.
Isn't that how everyone uses HN?
It seems much more sane, even when my machines have 8GB+ of RAM to simply have a "read later" bookmark folder on your bookmark bar^. I have my bookmark bar shown with single icon hot shortcuts, a blank folder with all my bookmarks and a simply "revisit" folder with articles, youtube videos, whatever to read during downtime. (I guess quite simply I don't trust my browser or session recovery enough to do that). Plus, C…
HN supports SPDY
21–30 of 79 posts
Re: HN supports SPDY
#22Re: HN supports SPDY
#23Just noticed that the indicator turned on :) https://addons.mozilla.org/En-us/firefox/addon/spdy-indicato...
https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/spdy-indicator/mpb...
Re: HN supports SPDY
#24Earlier quoted context omitted.
Isn't that how everyone uses HN?
It seems much more sane, even when my machines have 8GB+ of RAM to simply have a "read later" bookmark folder on your bookmark bar^. I have my bookmark bar shown with single icon hot shortcuts, a blank folder with all my bookmarks and a simply "revisit" folder with articles, youtube videos, whatever to read during downtime. (I guess quite simply I don't trust my browser or session recovery enough to do that). Plus, C…
An alternate mechanism for the same thing would be to make an HN extension that works more like StumbleUpon: have the browser history function as the "tabs", and just advance through the things you're reviewing (seeing both the HN thread and the original article at once) by clicking either "Save" or "Discard".
Re: HN supports SPDY
#25Has anyone built an NSURLProtocol subclass for SPDY? I did a quick GitHub search and found nothing. Seems to me that's one big use case that SPDY could dramatically improve, is all these native mobile apps which open SSL connections to their APIs.
Re: HN supports SPDY
#26I don't know that it's a security flaw in this context, but it's sloppy.
Re: HN supports SPDY
#27If you ask spdycheck.org to check a site that doesn't support spdy, and customise that site's Server header to include arbitrary html, spdycheck.org will include that header, verbatim and unescaped, in the page it presents to you (or anyone else who checks that site). I don't know that it's a security flaw in this context, but it's sloppy.
Re: HN supports SPDY
#28Re: HN supports SPDY
#29Great! Now if only they would implement allowing HEAD requests and support for any of the various headers that would allow me to get a 304. The reason I ask is because every time my Safari crashes, if I have 50 HN tabs open (as I often do on by Friday [1]) I'll get IP banned from HN because Safari will do a GET request on each page, but it can't pass any of the headers necessary to get back a 304, because HN doesn't…
> The way I consume HN is I load up HN once or twice a day, open up all the interesting links and their comment pages in new tabs, and then go back to work. By that time most pages are probably updated, so you wouldn’t get any 304s anyway. Since recent update, Firefox behavior is to only reload restored tabs on demand. This avoids that issue. https://blog.mozilla.org/blog/2012/06/05/firefox-has-a-redes...
Re: HN supports SPDY
#30Earlier quoted context omitted.
> The way I consume HN is I load up HN once or twice a day, open up all the interesting links and their comment pages in new tabs, and then go back to work. By that time most pages are probably updated, so you wouldn’t get any 304s anyway. Since recent update, Firefox behavior is to only reload restored tabs on demand. This avoids that issue. https://blog.mozilla.org/blog/2012/06/05/firefox-has-a-redes...
The behaviour has been built in and accessible since Firefox 4 (initially through about:config, later through the Preferences), but has only been enabled by default later on. I've personally been using it since it appeared, and it's great if you literally have hundreds of tabs open, or use tabs as temporary bookmarks.