Earlier quoted context omitted.
Said Mr. Hard Dick.
hardik is actually a common Indian name.
It being common just makes it even more funny.
61–70 of 118 posts
I appreciate the effort the mods take in curating titles, I really do - but please spare articles like this at least? I clicked on this link at work (part-time at grad-school) and now I have a "how to run a pornographic website faster" link logged in my name.
Oh, please. The article uses the word porn exactly three times in the introductory paragraphs. Four if you count the title. The comments here have double that, including your own use. If you were genuinely that paranoid about being "logged" for having visited a page that used the word porn (really?!) I doubt you'd be using it yourself.
I'm just saying that it could get someone into trouble.
As far as the "logging" goes, it had more to do with the word porn in the title of the page, because many content-filters just parse the title for blacklisted words.
If you're going to change the title, at least add NSFW to it...
>"I work on workplace, in a modern western society, not some theocratic backwater, that monitors my web activity and would frown if I visited an article with the word porn in it. This on 2013. I find this OK, and won't quit my job or raise hell protesting this degrading treatment, but would rather complain for HN titles".
In an age where people fight for LGBT rights, this is what the American workplace has come to?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Hey Jeremy, this is our engineering blog.
Thanks. This is the only article on the blog? I was actually intrigued by the site and was wondering if anyone on HN has used this service as a dev or a client....
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Are any of the porn sites larger than youtube?
I would rather learn if there was a porn site bigger than Netflix.. as Netflix currently uses around 30% of US bandwith [1] 1. http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2395372,00.asp
I'm astonished by some of the responses here, that could be summarised thusly: > "I work on workplace, in a modern western society, not some theocratic backwater, that monitors my web activity and would frown if I visited an article with the word porn in it. This on 2013. I find this OK, and won't quit my job or raise hell protesting this degrading treatment, but would rather complain for HN titles" . In an age where…
I don't agree with the decision not to protest, and I don't think HN should really care about catering to that demographic, but I understand their motive.
I'm astonished by some of the responses here, that could be summarised thusly: > "I work on workplace, in a modern western society, not some theocratic backwater, that monitors my web activity and would frown if I visited an article with the word porn in it. This on 2013. I find this OK, and won't quit my job or raise hell protesting this degrading treatment, but would rather complain for HN titles" . In an age where…
I work at a small company where no one would care. They also don't care if I spend time on Facebook, Twitter, etc. etc. But not everyone is in a company like that. Big legacy companies hire from the HN crowd too. Whether or not their policies are fair is not always a simplistic argument. However, what is as sure as rain is that trivial violations of those policies can be used as leverage to punish people, when the office politics get dirty and desperate.
It's best to let the worker -- the HN reader in this case -- make the decision whether he/she wants to pick that fight, rather than have them accidentally stumble into it.
Is this similar to what Wowza (wowzamedia.com) does? In terms of licensing, it is $55/mo/instance or $995 for a one-time license. There are also EC2 instances that start at 15 cents per hour. Much less expensive than FMS
And to answer your question, Wowza is just a cheaper FMS which also supports other platforms next to RTMP. This article is basically taking the more performant HTTP download mechanism for static content (like YouTube uses) and then hacking it to put a live stream in it instead.
I'm astonished by some of the responses here, that could be summarised thusly: > "I work on workplace, in a modern western society, not some theocratic backwater, that monitors my web activity and would frown if I visited an article with the word porn in it. This on 2013. I find this OK, and won't quit my job or raise hell protesting this degrading treatment, but would rather complain for HN titles" . In an age where…